-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
review of August pay period (201808) rewards by TAC + guides #925
Comments
The normal way I expect people to become guides is:
@Tonyprisca13 does that make sense? If you mean to say you're ready for step 3, perhaps edit your comment to mention who you are working with and what you have done so far? @jasoncruzzy did you add @Ojimadu at his request? I'm not sure I understand what's going on. Also, somebody please get @PatrickM727 to confirm that @Ojimadu should be a guide for Community Building (or point me to where he has already done so). As noted in #914 (comment) , I would really appreciate clarification from @PatrickM727 on how Marketing and Community Building relate. |
@Tonyprisca13 please request such votes in the issue itself, rather than here. Thanks! Btw, it helps to @mention the people that you want/expect to vote on it! |
@Tonyprisca13 if you're saying that issue #917 puts finishing the guide work at-risk for August, then commenting here is in order. But I see that Events guide @Ojimadu and Tech Lit guide @allancto are involved #917 and seem to be having a productive discussion of budget and rewards, so I don't see reason to discuss it here. |
Development looks done, except that @AbnerZheng needs to vote for himself on #881 . It's starting to look like I should find more back-up on guiding Development work. I don't think I got any help while I was away. |
Current pay period is now September
This was scheduled to happen before all of the votes today (Sep 9) but I was away due to a family emergency, and we don't yet have anyone else authorized and able to do it (#872). archive of trusted authorities: https://gist.github.com/dckc/dab60698c215bdff16008c1e150f48ac Remaining label areas???If you finished your review, go ahead and check the box in the description of this issue. If not, what went wrong? |
For |
I have been standing by for info from guides along the lines of the 20180912 RAM meeting notes:
You're still more than welcome to share that sort of info here, but I guess we're actually done figuring out the rewards for 201808 so I'm closing this. |
I have been standing by for info from guides along the lines of the 20180912 RAM meeting notes: @dckc as far as marketing goes: I have been out-of-office for the past 10 days, and @kitblake is out-of-office at the moment till the 30th (damn those Europeans with their holidays!). I haven't spoken with @PatrickM727 or anyone in the marketing org regarding sponsoring. So that's not much of an update, but maybe better than silence. -- A few areas of marketing where I expect we can make progress:
I believe those 3 areas to be the most significant pieces of work moving forward. Other areas worth mentioning (where I haven't got good solutions either):
I've just been introduced to Derek Beres, who is the new Director of Content (if I'm not mistaken), and maybe I can talk with him about how content efforts could be funded. |
Let's have another TAC + Guides meeting. much like #847, #809, #759
Guides from each area, please check the box when you're done with budgets and rewards for 201808:
Bonus points to anybody who checks the list above to see if it's consistent with the label descriptions and fixes any discrepancies they find.
Benefit to RChain
align bounty rewards with coop goals
Budget and Objective
Please make the issue SMART: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Timely.
Estimated Budget of Task: $2000
Estimated Timeline Required to Complete the Task: 60hrs? (10 persons * 6hrs)
How will we measure completion? a guide in each area has signaled that budgets and rewards from their area are in order for the month.
Legal
Task Submitter shall not submit Tasks that will involve RHOC being transacted in any manner that (i) jeopardizes RHOC’s status as a software access token or other relevant and applicable description of the RHOC as an “asset”—not a security— or (2) violates, in any manner, applicable U.S. Securities laws.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: