Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for the annotated triples syntax #358

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 23, 2023

Conversation

rubensworks
Copy link
Member

The RDF-star spec introduces syntatical suggar for annotating triples: https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/cg-spec/editors_draft.html#annotation-syntax

@jeswr
Copy link
Collaborator

jeswr commented Jun 22, 2023

Note that support for this is also added as part of #341; however I am in favor of releasing this as PR as a new minor version - and I will aim to get the next mver out soon.

Copy link
Member

@RubenVerborgh RubenVerborgh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All good, just weird that the coverage checker didn't catch some cases.

src/N3Lexer.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/N3Lexer.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/N3Lexer.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/N3Lexer.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
jeswr and others added 3 commits June 22, 2023 23:17
Co-authored-by: Ruben Verborgh <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ruben Verborgh <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ruben Verborgh <[email protected]>
src/N3Lexer.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/N3Lexer.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/N3Lexer.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jeswr jeswr merged commit eccaeb3 into rdfjs:main Jun 23, 2023
@jeswr
Copy link
Collaborator

jeswr commented Jun 23, 2023

Released as v1.17.0 - thanks @rubensworks !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants