Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🚨 [security] Update rexml 3.3.7 → 3.3.9 (patch) #43

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

depfu[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@depfu depfu bot commented Oct 28, 2024


🚨 Your current dependencies have known security vulnerabilities 🚨

This dependency update fixes known security vulnerabilities. Please see the details below and assess their impact carefully. We recommend to merge and deploy this as soon as possible!


Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

↗️ rexml (indirect, 3.3.7 → 3.3.9) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 REXML ReDoS vulnerability

Impact

The REXML gem before 3.3.9 has a ReDoS vulnerability when it parses an XML that has many digits between &# and x...; in a hex numeric character reference (&#x...;).

This does not happen with Ruby 3.2 or later. Ruby 3.1 is the only affected maintained Ruby. Note that Ruby 3.1 will reach EOL on 2025-03.

Patches

The REXML gem 3.3.9 or later include the patch to fix the vulnerability.

Workarounds

Use Ruby 3.2 or later instead of Ruby 3.1.

References

Release Notes

3.3.9

Improvements

  • Improved performance.

Fixes

  • Fixed a parse bug for text only invalid XML.

  • Fixed a parse bug that &#0x...; is accepted as a character
    reference.

Thanks

  • NAITOH Jun

3.3.8

Improvements

  • SAX2: Improve parse performance.

Fixes

  • Fixed a bug that unexpected attribute namespace conflict error for
    the predefined "xml" namespace is reported.
    • GH-208
    • Patch by KITAITI Makoto

Thanks

  • NAITOH Jun

  • KITAITI Makoto

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 11 commits:


Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu cancel merge
Cancels automatic merging of this PR
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file depfu 🚨 security Security update or fix labels Oct 28, 2024
@depfu depfu bot assigned otherguy Oct 28, 2024
@depfu depfu bot requested a review from a team October 28, 2024 16:53
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Oct 28, 2024

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 28, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (af5ea2f) to head (f24c77c).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #43   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           16        16           
  Lines          362       362           
=========================================
  Hits           362       362           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file depfu 🚨 security Security update or fix
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant