Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add link to github actions workflow in dst issue and use cache #185

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 5, 2024

Conversation

dfarr
Copy link
Member

@dfarr dfarr commented Jan 5, 2024

No description provided.

@dfarr dfarr requested a review from guergabo January 5, 2024 17:24
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (51c89d6) 64.19% compared to head (079d3fb) 64.19%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #185   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   64.19%   64.19%           
=======================================
  Files          83       83           
  Lines        8807     8807           
=======================================
  Hits         5654     5654           
  Misses       2772     2772           
  Partials      381      381           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dfarr dfarr changed the title Add link to github actions workflow in dst issue Add link to github actions workflow in dst issue and use cache Jan 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@guergabo guergabo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bless. nice idea.

@dfarr dfarr merged commit a892292 into main Jan 5, 2024
22 of 23 checks passed
@dfarr dfarr deleted the feature/dst-issue-deep-link branch January 5, 2024 18:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants