Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extend ProcessorsManagerCommand to start, stop, and manage leadership of PPs #1695

Closed
Tracked by #1799
tillrohrmann opened this issue Jul 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed
Tracked by #1799
Assignees

Comments

@tillrohrmann
Copy link
Contributor

tillrohrmann commented Jul 7, 2024

In order for the CC to control the PPs, the PartitionProcessorManager needs to start, stop, let a PP run for leadership, and step down. In order to make this possible, we need to extend the ProcessorsManagerCommand accordingly.

@tillrohrmann tillrohrmann self-assigned this Jul 7, 2024
tillrohrmann added a commit to tillrohrmann/restate that referenced this issue Jul 7, 2024
This commit introduces the UpdateProcessors command which allows an
external entity to instruct the PartitionProcessorManager to start
and stop PartitionProcessors.

This fixes restatedev#1695.
tillrohrmann added a commit to tillrohrmann/restate that referenced this issue Jul 8, 2024
This commit introduces the UpdateProcessors command which allows an
external entity to instruct the PartitionProcessorManager to start
and stop PartitionProcessors.

This fixes restatedev#1695.
tillrohrmann added a commit to tillrohrmann/restate that referenced this issue Jul 16, 2024
This commit introduces the ControlProcessors command which allows an
external entity to instruct the PartitionProcessorManager to start
and stop PartitionProcessors.

This fixes restatedev#1695.
tillrohrmann added a commit to tillrohrmann/restate that referenced this issue Jul 19, 2024
This commit introduces the ControlProcessors command which allows an
external entity to instruct the PartitionProcessorManager to start
and stop PartitionProcessors.

This fixes restatedev#1695.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant