Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix total order seek for transaction iterators #1578

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 31, 2024
Merged

Fix total order seek for transaction iterators #1578

merged 1 commit into from
May 31, 2024

Conversation

AhmedSoliman
Copy link
Contributor

Fix total order seek for transaction iterators

Copy link

Test Results

 99 files  ±0   99 suites  ±0   7m 29s ⏱️ -11s
 83 tests ±0   83 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
212 runs  ±0  212 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit e4d5087. ± Comparison against base commit 534bf34.

@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ impl<'a> StorageAccess for RocksDBTransaction<'a> {
self.range_iterator(
table,
key_kind,
ScanMode::WithinPrefix,
ScanMode::TotalOrder,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If they are, then it seems like the total order is the stricter variation.
Which would be a +1 for me to enable right now.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes.

@AhmedSoliman AhmedSoliman merged commit 1238710 into main May 31, 2024
5 checks passed
@AhmedSoliman AhmedSoliman deleted the pr1578 branch May 31, 2024 13:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants