feat: replace icelake Transform with iceberg

[xxchan]

I hereby agree to the terms of the RisingWave Labs, Inc. Contributor License Agreement.

What's changed and what's your intention?

remove icelake in frontend and sink

#17548

Checklist

• I have written necessary rustdoc comments
• I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
• I have added test labels as necessary. See details.
• I have added fuzzing tests or opened an issue to track them. (Optional, recommended for new SQL features Sqlsmith: Sql feature generation #7934).
• My PR contains breaking changes. (If it deprecates some features, please create a tracking issue to remove them in the future).
• All checks passed in ./risedev check (or alias, ./risedev c)
• My PR changes performance-critical code. (Please run macro/micro-benchmarks and show the results.)

• My PR contains critical fixes that are necessary to be merged into the latest release. (Please check out the details)

Documentation

• My PR needs documentation updates. (Please use the Release note section below to summarize the impact on users)

Release note

If this PR includes changes that directly affect users or other significant modifications relevant to the community, kindly draft a release note to provide a concise summary of these changes. Please prioritize highlighting the impact these changes will have on users.

[xxchan]

• feat: replace icelake Transform with iceberg #18625 👈
• build(deps): bump iceberg-rust to latest main #18686
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @xxchan and the rest of your teammates on Graphite

[stdrc]

lgtm

[xxchan]

😟

--- STDERR:              risingwave_planner_test::planner_test_runner sink ---
  | thread '<unnamed>' panicked at src/connector/src/connector_common/iceberg/mock_catalog.rs:279:26:
  | called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: FeatureUnsupported => Can't create table with partition spec now
 

<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">

[chenzl25]

We have an expression IcebergTransform which use icelake as an implementation. Can we use iceberg-rust mixed with it?

[chenzl25]

One known issue with partition is that if the table's partition changes later, we cannot write the partition value based on the expression used when creating the sink. Instead, we should use Iceberg's hidden partition capability to calculate it ourselves.

[xxchan]

We have an expression IcebergTransform which use icelake as an implementation. Can we use iceberg-rust mixed with it?

This is already changed together in the PR

One known issue with partition is that if the table's partition changes later, we cannot write the partition value based on the expression used when creating the sink. Instead, we should use Iceberg's hidden partition capability to calculate it ourselves.

I’m aware of this issue. Let’s just do the simple “translation” first, and fix logic issue later

[chenzl25]

LGTM, thanks!

[fuyufjh]

Ping @xxchan any updates?

[xxchan]

It needs more work in iceberg-rs. I'm focused on releasing shared source now, and will continue later.