-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 93
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cannot test work that inserts jobs using river.ClientFromContext
#512
Comments
I actually just encountered this yesterday! Rather than expose a setter for the context value or key, I’m trying to build a test helper that executes a single job. I think this can be a huge improvement for testability. Are you testing with a job row that you’ve actually inserted, or just a simulated job struct you’ve constructed yourself? |
We were previously using `context.Background()` in some situations to avoid cancellation of things that really shouldn't be cancelled by the user context cancellation. However, we can now do that with `context.WithoutCancel` instead in order to preserve context values without any cancellation or deadline. Fixes #512.
We were previously using `context.Background()` in some situations to avoid cancellation of things that really shouldn't be cancelled by the user context cancellation. However, we can now do that with `context.WithoutCancel` instead in order to preserve context values without any cancellation or deadline. Fixes #512.
Should be resolved by #514 in the next release, thanks for the report! |
I think your comment refers to #511, not this issue. Yeah, a test helper sounds great. I am testing with a simulated worker struct, like: w := scheduled_sync_worker.New(scheduled_sync_worker.Input{})
Expect(w.Work(ctx, &river.Job[scheduled_sync_worker.Args]{JobRow: &rivertype.JobRow{ID: 5}, Args: scheduled_sync_worker.Args{}})).To(Succeed()) |
D’oh, yes, sorry 😆 I have some details to work out with this test helper but I think that’s gotta be the real answer here. For a workaround, maybe define a helper function that falls back to extracting the client from an alternate context key you only use in tests. Not ideal though. |
Yup, that is what I ended up doing, not a huge problem but would be nice to avoid critical paths that are different when running unit tests, as you already know :) |
I'm pretty sure this was accidentally closed. |
@staugaard you're right, it’s actually #526 which provides a fix for this issue. |
If I use
river.ClientFromContext()
within a job, and test it using theWork
method (as docs suggest), I cannot insert the client into the context. Could be solved by adding ariver.ContextWithClient
helper, exposingctxKey
, etc.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: