Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Highlight values for reviewing in more places #495

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 21, 2022
Merged

Highlight values for reviewing in more places #495

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions booknews.Rmd
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@

## dev (0.9.0)

- 2022-07-21, highlight values for reviewing in more places (#481)

- 2022-07-20, Explanation of package submission via non-default branches (#485), added `@s3alfisc` to contributor list.

- 2022-07-20, add how to volunteer as a reviewer (#457).
Expand Down
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions softwarereview_reviewer.Rmd
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8,6 +8,11 @@ You might contact the editor in charge of the submission for any question you mi
Please strive to complete your review within 3 weeks of accepting a review request. We will aim to remind reviewers of upcoming and past due dates. Editors may assign
additional or alternate reviewers if a review is excessively late.

**rOpenSci’s community is our best asset.
We aim for reviews to be open, non-adversarial, and focused on improving software quality.
Be respectful and kind!
See our reviewers guide and [code of conduct](https://ropensci.org/code-of-conduct/) for more.**

_If you use our standards/checklists etc. when reviewing software elsewhere, do tell the recipients (e.g. journal editors, students, internal code review) that they came from rOpenSci, and tell us in [our public forum](https://discuss.ropensci.org/c/usecases), or [privately by email](https://ropensci.org/contact/)._
```

Expand Down
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions templates/request.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8,6 +8,11 @@ If you accept, note that we ask reviewers to complete reviews in three weeks. (W

Our [reviewers guide] details what we look for in a package review, and includes links to example reviews. Our standards are detailed in our [packaging guide], and we provide a reviewer [template] for you to use. Please make sure you do not have a [conflict of interest](https://devguide.ropensci.org/policies.html#coi) preventing you from reviewing this package. If you have questions or feedback, feel free to ask me or post to the [rOpenSci forum].

rOpenSci’s community is our best asset.
We aim for reviews to be open, non-adversarial, and focused on improving software quality.
Be respectful and kind!
See our reviewers guide and [code of conduct](https://ropensci.org/code-of-conduct/) for more.

Are you able to review? If you can not, suggestions for alternate reviewers are always helpful. If I don't hear from you within a week, I will assume you are unable to
review at this time.

Expand Down