Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI] Use testing repo for ABI workflows #860

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 26, 2023

Conversation

christophfroehlich
Copy link
Contributor

This should reduce the time span for failing tests after ABI breaking changes. Like currently, where there is a new release in testing but not synced to main yet.

@christophfroehlich christophfroehlich changed the title [CI] Use testing repo for ABI workflows. [CI] Use testing repo for ABI workflows Nov 26, 2023
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 26, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #860 (8185a2d) into master (0d3fc52) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #860   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   44.88%   44.88%           
=======================================
  Files          40       40           
  Lines        3636     3636           
  Branches     1716     1716           
=======================================
  Hits         1632     1632           
  Misses        832      832           
  Partials     1172     1172           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 44.88% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Copy link
Member

@bmagyar bmagyar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good idea!

@bmagyar bmagyar merged commit 2854a0b into ros-controls:master Nov 26, 2023
14 of 15 checks passed
@christophfroehlich christophfroehlich deleted the ci/testing_abi branch November 27, 2023 07:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants