Add loongarch support for dnf

[zhangwenlong8911]

Signed-off-by: Zhang Wenlong [email protected]

[pep8speaks]

Hello @zhangwenlong8911! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found:

There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! 🍻

Comment last updated at 2022-01-17 01:52:18 UTC

[zhangwenlong8911]

Thank you very much for your review, I modified the code according to your suggestions

[dmach]

Hi, this pull request adds loongarch32, but that doesn't seem to be part of other pull requests (rpm-software-management/rpm#1872 and rpm-software-management/libdnf#1402). Is it on purpose? Otherwise it would be good to add the same architectures to all places consistently.

[zhangwenlong8911]

Hi, this pull request adds loongarch32, but that doesn't seem to be part of other pull requests (rpm-software-management/rpm#1872 and rpm-software-management/libdnf#1402). Is it on purpose? Otherwise it would be good to add the same architectures to all places consistently.

loongarch32 is mainly used for embedded, loongarch64 has met the requirements, loongarchgarch32 should be deleted

[j-mracek]

Because related PR in RPM and LIBDNF was merged we can also merge it. Thank you very much for contribution.