Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

🚨 [security] [ruby] Update rails 6.1.7.8 → 6.1.7.9 (patch) #1074

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2024
Merged

🚨 [security] [ruby] Update rails 6.1.7.8 → 6.1.7.9 (patch) #1074

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2024

Conversation

depfu[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@depfu depfu bot commented Oct 23, 2024

🚨 Your current dependencies have known security vulnerabilities 🚨

This dependency update fixes known security vulnerabilities. Please see the details below and assess their impact carefully. We recommend to merge and deploy this as soon as possible!

Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ rails (6.1.7.8 → 6.1.7.9) · Repo

Release Notes

6.1.7.9

Active Support

  • No changes.

Active Model

  • No changes.

Active Record

  • No changes.

Action View

  • No changes.

Action Pack

  • Avoid regex backtracking in HTTP Token authentication

    [CVE-2024-47887]

  • Avoid regex backtracking in query parameter filtering

    [CVE-2024-41128]

Active Job

  • No changes.

Action Mailer

Action Cable

  • No changes.

Active Storage

  • No changes.

Action Mailbox

  • No changes.

Action Text

  • Avoid backtracing in plain_text_for_blockquote_node

    [CVE-2024-47888]

Railties

  • No changes.

Guides

  • No changes.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 7 commits:

↗️ actioncable (indirect, 6.1.7.8 → 6.1.7.9) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.1.7.9 (from changelog)

  • No changes.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 7 commits:

↗️ actionmailbox (indirect, 6.1.7.8 → 6.1.7.9) · Repo · Changelog

↗️ actionmailer (indirect, 6.1.7.8 → 6.1.7.9) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Possible ReDoS vulnerability in block_format in Action Mailer

There is a possible ReDoS vulnerability in the block_format helper in Action Mailer. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-47889.

Impact

Carefully crafted text can cause the block_format helper to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability. All users running an affected release should either upgrade or apply the relevant patch immediately.

Ruby 3.2 has mitigations for this problem, so Rails applications using Ruby 3.2 or newer are unaffected. Rails 8.0.0.beta1 requires Ruby 3.2 or greater so is unaffected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Users can avoid calling the block_format helper or upgrade to Ruby 3.2

Credits

Thanks to ooooooo_q for the report!

Release Notes

6.1.7.9 (from changelog)

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 7 commits:

↗️ actionpack (indirect, 6.1.7.8 → 6.1.7.9) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Possible ReDoS vulnerability in HTTP Token authentication in Action Controller

There is a possible ReDoS vulnerability in Action Controller's HTTP Token authentication. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-47887.

Impact

For applications using HTTP Token authentication via authenticate_or_request_with_http_token or similar, a carefully crafted header may cause header parsing to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability. All users running an affected release should either upgrade or apply the relevant patch immediately.

Ruby 3.2 has mitigations for this problem, so Rails applications using Ruby 3.2 or newer are unaffected. Rails 8.0.0.beta1 depends on Ruby 3.2 or greater so is unaffected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Users on Ruby 3.2 are unaffected by this issue.

Credits

Thanks to scyoon for reporting

🚨 Possible ReDoS vulnerability in query parameter filtering in Action Dispatch

There is a possible ReDoS vulnerability in the query parameter filtering routines of Action Dispatch. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-41128.

Impact

Carefully crafted query parameters can cause query parameter filtering to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability. All users running an affected release should either upgrade or apply the relevant patch immediately.

Ruby 3.2 has mitigations for this problem, so Rails applications using Ruby 3.2 or newer are unaffected. Rails 8.0.0.beta1 depends on Ruby 3.2 or greater so is unaffected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Users on Ruby 3.2 are unaffected by this issue.

Credits

Thanks to scyoon for the report and patches!

Release Notes

6.1.7.9 (from changelog)

  • Avoid regex backtracking in HTTP Token authentication

    [CVE-2024-47887]

  • Avoid regex backtracking in query parameter filtering

    [CVE-2024-41128]

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 7 commits:

↗️ actiontext (indirect, 6.1.7.8 → 6.1.7.9) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 Possible ReDoS vulnerability in plain_text_for_blockquote_node in Action Text

There is a possible ReDoS vulnerability in the plain_text_for_blockquote_node helper in Action Text. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-47888.

Impact

Carefully crafted text can cause the plain_text_for_blockquote_node helper to take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a DoS vulnerability. All users running an affected release should either upgrade or apply the relevant patch immediately.

Ruby 3.2 has mitigations for this problem, so Rails applications using Ruby 3.2 or newer are unaffected. Rails 8.0.0.beta1 depends on Ruby 3.2 or greater so is unaffected.

Releases

The fixed releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

Users can avoid calling plain_text_for_blockquote_node or upgrade to Ruby 3.2

Credits

Thanks to ooooooo_q for the report!

Release Notes

6.1.7.9 (from changelog)

  • Avoid backtracing in plain_text_for_blockquote_node

    [CVE-2024-47888]

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 7 commits:

↗️ actionview (indirect, 6.1.7.8 → 6.1.7.9) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.1.7.9 (from changelog)

  • No changes.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 7 commits:

↗️ activejob (indirect, 6.1.7.8 → 6.1.7.9) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.1.7.9 (from changelog)

  • No changes.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 7 commits:

↗️ activemodel (indirect, 6.1.7.8 → 6.1.7.9) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.1.7.9 (from changelog)

  • No changes.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 7 commits:

↗️ activerecord (indirect, 6.1.7.8 → 6.1.7.9) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.1.7.9 (from changelog)

  • No changes.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 7 commits:

↗️ activestorage (indirect, 6.1.7.8 → 6.1.7.9) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.1.7.9 (from changelog)

  • No changes.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 7 commits:

↗️ activesupport (indirect, 6.1.7.8 → 6.1.7.9) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.1.7.9 (from changelog)

  • No changes.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 7 commits:

↗️ railties (indirect, 6.1.7.8 → 6.1.7.9) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.1.7.9 (from changelog)

  • No changes.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 7 commits:

Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu cancel merge
Cancels automatic merging of this PR
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu bot added the depfu label Oct 23, 2024
@depfu depfu bot merged commit 6e46f5f into master Oct 23, 2024
1 check passed
@depfu depfu bot deleted the depfu/update/group/rails-6.1.7.9 branch October 23, 2024 16:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
depfu
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
0 participants