-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 201
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Reorganization Proposal 1] Move traits into blocking/nonblocking modules #278
Conversation
r? @therealprof (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
is it worth considering this in the context of #172 (and the possible provision of future-based non-blocking types?) |
As we discussed in the meeting, |
90b16af
to
4f60777
Compare
Any objections or can we merge this @rust-embedded/hal ? |
parallel |
Alright, can I get an actual approval here @rust-embedded/hal? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems we're all in agreement here, so let's do this.
bors r+
As discussed in our weekly meeting.
I chose
nonblocking
as module name becausenb
could be misunderstood as a re-exportednb
crate.An alternative is #279