Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(change): Don't mention non-existent workspace.badges #14042

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 11, 2024

Conversation

epage
Copy link
Contributor

@epage epage commented Jun 11, 2024

No description provided.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 11, 2024

r? @ehuss

rustbot has assigned @ehuss.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 11, 2024
Comment on lines +97 to 98
This was considered a bug.
Keep in mind that `[badges]` is effectively deprecated.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about this?

Suggested change
This was considered a bug.
Keep in mind that `[badges]` is effectively deprecated.
The support of it was considered a bug, since `[badges]` is deprecated.

Either is fine. r=me when ready.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That implies a causation which isn't there.

@epage
Copy link
Contributor Author

epage commented Jun 11, 2024

@bors r=weihanglo

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 11, 2024

📌 Commit b3c5e1a has been approved by weihanglo

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 11, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 11, 2024

⌛ Testing commit b3c5e1a with merge b134eff...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 11, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: weihanglo
Pushing b134eff to master...

@bors bors merged commit b134eff into rust-lang:master Jun 11, 2024
22 checks passed
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2024
Update cargo

14 commits in b1feb75d062444e2cee8b3d2aaa95309d65e9ccd..4dcbca118ab7f9ffac4728004c983754bc6a04ff
2024-06-07 20:16:17 +0000 to 2024-06-11 16:27:02 +0000
- Add local registry overlays (rust-lang/cargo#13926)
- docs(change): Don't mention non-existent workspace.badges (rust-lang/cargo#14042)
- test: migrate binary_name to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14041)
- Bump to 0.82.0; update changelog (rust-lang/cargo#14040)
- tests: Migrate alt_registry to snapbox (rust-lang/cargo#14031)
- fix: proc-macro example from dep no longer affects feature resolution (rust-lang/cargo#13892)
- chore: Bump cargo-util-schemas to 0.5 (rust-lang/cargo#14038)
- chore(deps): update rust crate pulldown-cmark to 0.11.0 (rust-lang/cargo#14037)
- fix: remove `__CARGO_GITOXIDE_DISABLE_LIST_FILES` env var (rust-lang/cargo#14036)
- chore(deps): update rust crate itertools to 0.13.0 (rust-lang/cargo#13998)
- fix(toml): remove `lib.plugin` key support and make it warning (rust-lang/cargo#13902)
- chore(deps): update compatible (rust-lang/cargo#13995)
- fix: using `--release/debug` and `--profile` together becomes an error (rust-lang/cargo#13971)
- fix(toml): Convert warnings that `licence` and `readme` files do not exist into errors (rust-lang/cargo#13921)

r? ghost
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.81.0 milestone Jun 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants