Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add an option to ignore SSL revocation checking #3699

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 1, 2017

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

This is apparently required in some Windows setups to get past SSL context
creation in schannel.

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 22, 2017

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #3682) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

This is apparently required in some Windows setups to get past SSL context
creation in schannel.
@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Feb 28, 2017

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 28, 2017

📌 Commit 923f21c has been approved by brson

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 28, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 923f21c with merge 4112e95...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 28, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

alexcrichton commented Feb 28, 2017 via email

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 1, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 923f21c with merge 1eda2d2...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2017
Add an option to ignore SSL revocation checking

This is apparently required in some Windows setups to get past SSL context
creation in schannel.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 1, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: brson
Pushing 1eda2d2 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 923f21c into rust-lang:master Mar 1, 2017
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the sslop branch April 20, 2017 18:41
@ehuss ehuss added this to the 1.17.0 milestone Feb 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants