Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump stable version to 0.43.1 #8004

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 17, 2020
Merged

Bump stable version to 0.43.1 #8004

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 17, 2020

Conversation

ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

@ehuss ehuss commented Mar 16, 2020

There was a hiccup where 0.43.0 was published to crates.io missing a change (#7848), see #7994 for details. It is not super critical, but in rare cases the bug can cause cargo used as a library to hang. I think bumping the version and re-publishing is relatively low-effort and low-risk.

This also includes backports to appease CI: #7883 #7906 #7955.

bors and others added 4 commits March 15, 2020 17:59
…crichton

Fix plugin tests for latest nightly.

Crate was renamed in rust-lang/rust#69592.
Modify test to make `rustc` PR mergeable

Modify a test to be less succeptible to failure for wording changes.
Switch azure to macOS 10.15.

Switches CI to the macOS 10.15 image.  Since 32-bit support is no longer available, this changes how cross-compile testing works.  I decided to use `x86_64-apple-ios` as a cross target, since it can easily build/link on macOS.  `cargo run` won't work without a simulator, so some of the tests are restructured to check if `cargo run` is allowed.  If you do have a simulator, it should Just Work.  CI doesn't seem to be configured with a simulator installed, and I didn't bother to look if that would be possible (the simulators tend to be several gigabytes in size).

An alternative approach would be to use wasm as a cross target, which is also fairly easy to support.  But wasm is a sufficiently different target that it can cause some issues in some tests, and is a bit harder to run as an executable.

This also adds some more help text on how to configure cross-compile tests.

Rustup is now installed on macOS by default, so no need to install it.  Unfortunately self-updates are not allowed, but hopefully that won't be an issue.

Closes rust-lang#7821
@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @alexcrichton

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive
Copy link

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

  • Pull requests are usually filed against the master branch for this repo, but this one is against rust-1.42.0. Please double check that you specified the right target!

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 16, 2020
@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor Author

ehuss commented Mar 16, 2020

Is there a reason CI is configured to only trigger when PRs target the master branch (here)?

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

Nah I think that's a bug in our configuration, we should enhance that to test against all prs to all branches.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 17, 2020

📌 Commit 9bf03ad has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 17, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 17, 2020

⌛ Testing commit 9bf03ad with merge 5b129c4...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 17, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-azure
Approved by: alexcrichton
Pushing 5b129c4 to rust-1.42.0...

@bors bors merged commit 5b129c4 into rust-lang:rust-1.42.0 Mar 17, 2020
@ehuss ehuss added this to the 1.42.0 milestone Feb 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants