-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change the RFC header to improve the PR/issue links #62
Comments
👍 |
chris-morgan
added a commit
to chris-morgan/rfcs
that referenced
this issue
Jul 29, 2014
Fixes rust-lang#62. Of the formats proposed there, I went with option (e.c).
chris-morgan
added a commit
to chris-morgan/rfcs
that referenced
this issue
Jul 30, 2014
Fixes rust-lang#62. Of the formats proposed there, I went with option (e.c).
glaebhoerl
pushed a commit
to glaebhoerl/rfcs
that referenced
this issue
Aug 8, 2014
Fixes rust-lang#62. Of the formats proposed there, I went with option (e.c).
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
(a) At present, the format of the RFC header (excluding the start date line which is fine) is like this:
(b) Given that we are using GitHub, this would be more immediately useful like this:
(c) For optimal clarity and portability across GitHub, we could extend the RFC PR to be an absolute reference:
(d) For absolute portability, we could use URLs:
(e) Possibly with friendly labels (mix this with the first three options to produce (e.a), (e.b) and (e.c); below, (e.c) is shown):
I suggest (c) or (e.c).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: