Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tracking issue for disallowing struct literals in ambiguous positions #14803

Closed
alexcrichton opened this issue Jun 10, 2014 · 1 comment · Fixed by #14885
Closed

Tracking issue for disallowing struct literals in ambiguous positions #14803

alexcrichton opened this issue Jun 10, 2014 · 1 comment · Fixed by #14885
Labels
B-RFC-approved Blocker: Approved by a merged RFC but not yet implemented.
Milestone

Comments

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Tracking issue for RFC PR 92.

Nominating.

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

P-backcompat-lang, 1.0.

@pnkfelix pnkfelix added this to the 1.0 milestone Jun 12, 2014
pcwalton added a commit to pcwalton/rust that referenced this issue Jun 23, 2014
`for...in`.

Closes rust-lang#14803.

If you used a structure literal after one of these keywords, surround it
in parentheses.

[breaking-change]
bors added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 24, 2014
…xcrichton

`for...in`.

Closes #14803.

If you used a structure literal after one of these keywords, surround it
in parentheses.

[breaking-change]

r? @nick29581
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this issue Jun 5, 2023
Add metrics for unevaluated constants, failed mir bodies, and failed data layouts

fix rust-lang#14803
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
B-RFC-approved Blocker: Approved by a merged RFC but not yet implemented.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants