Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: add link for the next project in the guessing-game doc #32936

Closed
deepak opened this issue Apr 13, 2016 · 5 comments · Fixed by #32937
Closed

docs: add link for the next project in the guessing-game doc #32936

deepak opened this issue Apr 13, 2016 · 5 comments · Fixed by #32937

Comments

@deepak
Copy link
Contributor

deepak commented Apr 13, 2016

I am learning rust and reading the book for the first time

The guessing-game section mentions a "Next Project" at the very end

Our next project will show off even more.

We can add a link to that project ?

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

It's referring to the next project showed in the book (so next section if I remember well). If @steveklabnik confirms, this issue can be closed.

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

Actually, this sentence is vestigial from when we had the Dining Philosophers chapter. I would actually prefer to remove this sentence. Want to submit another PR? :D

@deepak
Copy link
Contributor Author

deepak commented Apr 13, 2016

@steveklabnik absolutely :-) on it

@deepak
Copy link
Contributor Author

deepak commented Apr 13, 2016

was interested in looking at the old example.
pasted here for future people
was removed in 0c6c34d

@deepak
Copy link
Contributor Author

deepak commented Apr 13, 2016

@steveklabnik sent PR

steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this issue Apr 14, 2016
…roject-in-guessing-game-doc, r=Manishearth

Doc fix: Do not mention next project in book/guessing-game

fixes rust-lang#32936
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants