-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
$crate incorrectly substituted in attribute macro invocation containing bang macro invocation #62325
Comments
This is #43081, ultimately. The spans are dummy, as you can see, this means During pretty-printing we print Now thinking about this again, I'm not sure why we cannot print it as |
I recall it now. Hmm, perhaps the conversion should be enabled only if the token printing routine is called from inside of AST printing, but not otherwise. |
(I'll try to fix this tomorrow, shouldn't be too hard.) |
Fixed in #62393 |
…ulacrum Fix pretty-printing of `$crate` (take 4) Pretty-print `$crate` as `crate` or `crate_name` in unstructured tokens like `a $crate c` in `foo!(a $crate c)`, but only if those tokens are printed as a part of AST pretty-printing, rather than as a standalone token stream. Fixes rust-lang#62325 Previous iterations - rust-lang#56647, rust-lang#57155, rust-lang#57915.
## Motivation Currently, the `tracing` macros require curly braces as delimiters when a `format_args` macro is used in addition to structured fields, like: ```rust info!({ field1 = value1, field2 = value2 }, "unstructured message"); ``` This is confusing, since the delimiters are not used in other cases; it makes the syntax more complex; and, most importantly, I think it looks kind of ugly. I've been planning to get rid of this when we transition to procedural macros, but the transition is currently blocked on a compiler bug, rust-lang/rust#62325. (see #133 (comment)) I've been getting tired of waiting for this. ## Solution: This branch updates the `tracing` crate's macros to support a format_args message after the structured key-value fields without curly braces. For example, ```rust let yay = "WITHOUT DELIMITERS!!!"; info!(field1 = value1, field2 = value2, "message: {}", yay); ``` I've updated the tests & examples in the `tracing` crate so that they show this usage rather than the old usage. The old form with curly braces is still supported, since removing it would be a breaking change, but we'll transition it out in examples & tutorials. (can you put a `deprecated` attribute on a specific macro arm???). Signed-off-by: Eliza Weisman <[email protected]>
When an attribute macro input contains
$ident
, it is correctly substituted both inside and outside of a function-like macro invocation i.e. both of the $ident's in[u8; $ident + m!($ident)]
would be substituted as expected.But when an attribute macro input contains
$crate
, it is only substituted outside of a function-like macro. Inside, it incorrectly disintegrates intoPunct('$'), Ident(crate)
when the whole bang macro invocation is passed to an attribute macro (or derive macro). In the case of[u8; $crate::N + m!($crate::N)]
the first $crate would be handled correctly but the second one would be passed incorrectly as two tokens. See where I put// WRONG
in the output below.Cargo.toml
src/main.rs
src/lib.rs
Output of cargo check:
Mentioning @petrochenkov who fixed my previous three $crate woes (#57089, #56622, #38016).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: