Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add another example for uN::carrying_mul #101995

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 21, 2022

Conversation

scottmcm
Copy link
Member

The prose talks about doing this, so might as well add a simple code example of it too.

The prose talked about doing this, so might as well add a simple code example of it too.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 18, 2022

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Sep 18, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 18, 2022
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 21, 2022

📌 Commit 690aaef has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 21, 2022
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2022
…ark-Simulacrum

Add another example for `uN::carrying_mul`

The prose talks about doing this, so might as well add a simple code example of it too.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2022
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#89891 (`alloc`: add unstable cfg features `no_rc` and `no_sync`)
 - rust-lang#101995 (Add another example for `uN::carrying_mul`)
 - rust-lang#102031 (Adding ignore fuchsia tests for Backtrace, ErrorKind cases)
 - rust-lang#102041 (Improve `-Zmeta-stats` some more)
 - rust-lang#102045 (fix ConstProp handling of written_only_inside_own_block_locals)
 - rust-lang#102058 (Clarify Path::extension() semantics in docs abstract)
 - rust-lang#102059 (Use rebind instead of dummy binder in `SameTypeModuloInfer` relation)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 9b24a1f into rust-lang:master Sep 21, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.66.0 milestone Sep 21, 2022
@scottmcm scottmcm deleted the carrying-mul-example branch September 21, 2022 22:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants