Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 8 pull requests #102165

Merged
merged 20 commits into from
Sep 23, 2022
Merged

Rollup of 8 pull requests #102165

merged 20 commits into from
Sep 23, 2022

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

diegooliveira and others added 20 commits September 14, 2022 15:05
This allows the tests to pass even if the user has RUST_BACKTRACE
set when running 'x.py'
This was previously limited to partial relro, citing issues on RHEL6,
but that's no longer a supported platform since rust-lang#95026. We have long
been enabling full relro in RHEL7's own Rust builds for ppc64, without
trouble, so it should be fine to drop this workaround.
This code was added in 003b2bc to prevent
these headers from overlapping `.out-of-band` side items. That stopped
being a problem when 3f92ff3 switched
rustdoc over to using `float`, rather than `position: absolute`, to
implement this.
PR rust-lang#101224 added support for async fn in trait desuraging behind the
return_position_impl_trait_in_trait feature.

Split this out so that it's behind its own feature gate, since async fn
in trait doesn't need to follow the same stabilization schedule.
…iler-errors

Split out async_fn_in_trait into a separate feature

PR rust-lang#101224 added support for async fn in trait desuraging behind the `return_position_impl_trait_in_trait` feature.

Split this out so that it's behind its own feature gate, since async fn in trait doesn't need to follow the same stabilization schedule.
Note if mismatched types have a similar name

If users get a type error between similarly named types, it will point out that these are actually different types, and where they were defined.
Migrated the rustc_passes annotation without effect diagnostic infrastructure

Small change to move the validation for annotations to the new diagnostic infrastructure.
…to-rustup, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Distribute rust-docs-json via rustup.

I am not 100% sure on how to treat `rust-json-docs` in `target_host_combination`. I went along with a similar strategy to the one used for `rust-docs`, but looking for guidance there.
…dth, r=GuillaumeGomez

rustdoc: remove unnecessary `max-width` on headers

This code was added in 003b2bc to prevent these headers from overlapping `.out-of-band` side items. That stopped being a problem when 3f92ff3 switched rustdoc over to using `float`, rather than `position: absolute`, to implement this.
Deduplicate two functions that would soon have been three

rust-lang#101900 would have added another copy of this for effects
…k-Simulacrum

Set 'exec-env:RUST_BACKTRACE=0' in const-eval-select tests

This allows the tests to pass even if the user has RUST_BACKTRACE set when running 'x.py'
Allow full relro on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu

This was previously limited to partial relro, citing issues on RHEL6,
but that's no longer a supported platform since rust-lang#95026. We have long
been enabling full relro in RHEL7's own Rust builds for ppc64, without
trouble, so it should be fine to drop this workaround.
@rustbot rustbot added T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) A-translation Area: Translation infrastructure, and migrating existing diagnostics to SessionDiagnostic T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Sep 23, 2022
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=8

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 23, 2022

📌 Commit 8e3b9bc has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Sep 23, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 23, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 8e3b9bc with merge 7393c37a38739ec3772df63fd56d308384006ab3...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 23, 2022

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Sep 23, 2022
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors retry no logs

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 23, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 23, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 8e3b9bc with merge 4d44e09...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 23, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 4d44e09 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Sep 23, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 4d44e09 into rust-lang:master Sep 23, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.66.0 milestone Sep 23, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (4d44e09): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean1 range count2
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.4% [1.2%, 1.6%] 7
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.4% [-3.1%, -1.9%] 4
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean1 range count2
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
3.5% [3.4%, 3.7%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.9% [-3.0%, -2.7%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -2.9% [-3.0%, -2.7%] 2

Footnotes

  1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change 2

  2. number of relevant changes 2

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@davidtwco davidtwco removed the A-translation Area: Translation infrastructure, and migrating existing diagnostics to SessionDiagnostic label Oct 4, 2022
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-n5oquhe branch October 9, 2022 00:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.