-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make VecDeque::from_iter
O(1) from vec(_deque)::IntoIter
#105453
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Dec 8, 2022
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
the8472
reviewed
Dec 8, 2022
@bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Dec 9, 2022
Dylan-DPC
added a commit
to Dylan-DPC/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2022
…8472 Make `VecDeque::from_iter` O(1) from `vec(_deque)::IntoIter` As suggested in rust-lang#105046 (comment) by r? `@the8472` `Vec` & `VecDeque`'s `IntoIter`s own the allocations, and even if advanced can be turned into `VecDeque`s in O(1). This is just a specialization, not an API or doc commitment, so I don't think it needs an FCP.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2022
…iaskrgr Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#102406 (Make `missing_copy_implementations` more cautious) - rust-lang#105265 (Add `rustc_on_unimplemented` to `Sum` and `Product` trait.) - rust-lang#105385 (Skip test on s390x as LLD does not support the platform) - rust-lang#105453 (Make `VecDeque::from_iter` O(1) from `vec(_deque)::IntoIter`) - rust-lang#105468 (Mangle "main" as "__main_void" on wasm32-wasi) - rust-lang#105480 (rustdoc: remove no-op mobile CSS `#sidebar-toggle { text-align }`) - rust-lang#105489 (Fix typo in apple_base.rs) - rust-lang#105504 (rustdoc: make stability badge CSS more consistent) - rust-lang#105506 (Tweak `rustc_must_implement_one_of` diagnostic output) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As suggested in #105046 (comment) by
r? @the8472
Vec
&VecDeque
'sIntoIter
s own the allocations, and even if advanced can be turned intoVecDeque
s in O(1).This is just a specialization, not an API or doc commitment, so I don't think it needs an FCP.