Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 10 pull requests #105731

Closed
wants to merge 28 commits into from

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

estebank and others added 28 commits December 13, 2022 18:55
When `with_forced_trimmed_paths` is used, only print filename and start
of the closure's span, to reduce their verbosity.
Do not say "Type changed to X here" when the only difference is caused
by lifetimes.
As a workaround for the full `#[refine]` semantics not being implemented
yet, forbit returning a concrete future type like `Box<dyn Future>` or a
manually implemented Future.

`-> impl Future` is still permitted; while that can also cause
accidental refinement, that's behind a different feature gate
(`return_position_impl_trait_in_trait`) and that problem exists
regardless of whether the trait method is async, so will have to be
solved more generally.

Fixes rust-lang#102745
…f-id, r=estebank

Use impl's def id when calculating type to specify in UFCS

Fixes rust-lang#104327
Fixes rust-lang#104328

Also addresses rust-lang#102670 (comment)
…ler-errors

Ensure async trait impls are async (or otherwise return an opaque type)

As a workaround for the full `#[refine]` semantics not being implemented
yet, forbit returning a concrete future type like `Box<dyn Future>` or a
manually implemented Future.

`-> impl Future` is still permitted; while that can also cause
accidental refinement, that's behind a different feature gate
(`return_position_impl_trait_in_trait`) and that problem exists
regardless of whether the trait method is async, so will have to be
solved more generally.

Fixes rust-lang#102745
…env-2, r=estebank

Highlight conflicting param-env candidates, again

Un-reverts rust-lang#98794 (i.e. reverts rust-lang#99290).

The previous time I attempted to land this PR, it was because of an incremental issue (rust-lang#99233). The repro instructions in the issue is no longer manifest the ICE -- I think it's because this ambiguity code was refactored (I think by ```@lcnr)``` to no longer store the ambiguities in the fulfillment error, but instead recompute them on the fly.

The main motivation for trying to re-land this is that it fixes rust-lang#105131 by highlighting the root-cause of the issue, which is conflicting param-env candidates:

```
error[E0283]: type annotations needed: cannot satisfy `Self: Gen<'source>`
   |
note: multiple `impl`s or `where` clauses satisfying `Self: Gen<'source>` found
  --> $DIR/conflicting-bounds.rs:3:1
   |
LL | pub trait Gen<'source> {
   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
...
LL |         Self: for<'s> Gen<'s, Output = T>;
   |               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: aborting due to previous error

For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0283`.
```

Fixes rust-lang#105131.
Fixes (again) rust-lang#98786
…e-fix, r=Nilstrieb

Fix `-Z print-type-sizes` for generators with discriminant field ordered first

Fixes rust-lang#105589
Fixes rust-lang#105591
…le, r=davidtwco

Auto traits in `dyn Trait + Auto` are suggestable

Not  sure why I had made the `IsSuggestableVisitor` have that rule to not consider `dyn Trait + Auto` to be suggestable.

It's possible that this was done because of the fact that we don't print the right parentheses for `&(dyn Trait + Auto)`, but that's a problem with printing these types in general that we probably have tracked somewhere else...
…li-obk

Make `report_projection_error` more `Term` agnostic

Fixes rust-lang#105632
Point at method chains on `E0271` errors

Follow up to rust-lang#105332. Fix rust-lang#33941. CC rust-lang#9082.

r? ```@oli-obk```
…-errors

Suggest constraining type parameter with `Clone`

Fix rust-lang#34896.
…-errors

Add regression test for rust-lang#104678

Closes rust-lang#104678
r? ```@compiler-errors```

Signed-off-by: Yuki Okushi <[email protected]>
…rors

more clippy::complexity fixes

r? `@compiler-errors`
@rustbot rustbot added A-translation Area: Translation infrastructure, and migrating existing diagnostics to SessionDiagnostic S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 15, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Dec 15, 2022
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=10

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 15, 2022

📌 Commit 6028c29 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 15, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 15, 2022

🔒 Merge conflict

This pull request and the master branch diverged in a way that cannot be automatically merged. Please rebase on top of the latest master branch, and let the reviewer approve again.

How do I rebase?

Assuming self is your fork and upstream is this repository, you can resolve the conflict following these steps:

  1. git checkout rollup-uque6to (switch to your branch)
  2. git fetch upstream master (retrieve the latest master)
  3. git rebase upstream/master -p (rebase on top of it)
  4. Follow the on-screen instruction to resolve conflicts (check git status if you got lost).
  5. git push self rollup-uque6to --force-with-lease (update this PR)

You may also read Git Rebasing to Resolve Conflicts by Drew Blessing for a short tutorial.

Please avoid the "Resolve conflicts" button on GitHub. It uses git merge instead of git rebase which makes the PR commit history more difficult to read.

Sometimes step 4 will complete without asking for resolution. This is usually due to difference between how Cargo.lock conflict is handled during merge and rebase. This is normal, and you should still perform step 5 to update this PR.

Error message
Auto-merging compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/error_reporting/suggestions.rs
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/error_reporting/suggestions.rs
Auto-merging compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/error_reporting/mod.rs
Auto-merging compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/print/pretty.rs
Auto-merging compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/diagnostics.rs
Auto-merging compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/method/suggest.rs
Auto-merging compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/fn_ctxt/suggestions.rs
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/fn_ctxt/suggestions.rs
Auto-merging compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/check/compare_method.rs
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Dec 15, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 15, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #105657) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-uque6to branch December 22, 2022 10:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-translation Area: Translation infrastructure, and migrating existing diagnostics to SessionDiagnostic rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants