Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Normalize test output more thoroughly #106793

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2023

Conversation

Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

This prevents differences in local environments, which may (for example) end up with a longer backtrace with more digits in the backtrace prefix, as happened to me. While we're at it, clean more of the output up, including the exact location of the error in the compiler.

cc #106521 which introduced this test

This prevents differences in local environments, which may (for example)
end up with a longer backtrace with more digits in the backtrace prefix,
as happened to me. While we're at it, clean more of the output up,
including the exact location of the error in the compiler.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 13, 2023

r? @nagisa

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 13, 2023
@Noratrieb
Copy link
Member

cc @compiler-errors

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

r? @compiler-errors @bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 13, 2023

📌 Commit 95ef76b has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rustbot rustbot assigned compiler-errors and unassigned nagisa Jan 13, 2023
@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 13, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2023
…compiler-errors

Normalize test output more thoroughly

This prevents differences in local environments, which may (for example) end up with a longer backtrace with more digits in the backtrace prefix, as happened to me. While we're at it, clean more of the output up, including the exact location of the error in the compiler.

cc rust-lang#106521 which introduced this test
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#104645 (Add log-backtrace option to show backtraces along with logging)
 - rust-lang#106465 (Bump `IMPLIED_BOUNDS_ENTAILMENT` to Deny + ReportNow)
 - rust-lang#106489 (Fix linker detection for linker (drivers) with a version postfix (e.g. clang-12 instead of clang))
 - rust-lang#106585 (When suggesting writing a fully qualified path probe for appropriate types)
 - rust-lang#106641 (Provide help on closures capturing self causing borrow checker errors)
 - rust-lang#106678 (Warn when using panic-strategy abort for proc-macro crates)
 - rust-lang#106701 (Fix `mpsc::SyncSender` spinning behavior)
 - rust-lang#106793 (Normalize test output more thoroughly)
 - rust-lang#106797 (riscv: Fix ELF header flags)
 - rust-lang#106813 (Remove redundant session field)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit e0f6840 into rust-lang:master Jan 14, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.68.0 milestone Jan 14, 2023
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum deleted the normalize-test branch January 14, 2023 01:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants