-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Expose try_destructure_mir_constant_for_diagnostics directly to clippy #115819
Merged
bors
merged 3 commits into
rust-lang:beta
from
oli-obk:try_destructure_mir_constant_for_diagnostics_strikes_again
Sep 29, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @oli-obk , what intuition should a developer use to determine which of these two methods they are supposed to call in a given context? How can I know if the query-based
lcx.tcx.$METHOD
is the appropriate thing to call?Is it a matter of "If you see an ICE with 'forcing query with already existing
DepNode
', then you are doing it wrong" ? Unfortunately the error output I see on #83085 doesn't clearly point one to this code, so I don't know how someone would track it down...There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think anyone should be calling this query. It was wrong of me to implement the traits that allowed
ConstValue
(an argument to the query), to be used in query arguments, as it can produce equal stable hashes for things that are not identical viaPartialEq
(in fact, this is very easy to cause, just by allocating two differentAllocId
s for the sameAllocation
, as allAllocId
s are stable-hashed by the allocation they refer to).But we have no way to avoid it from pretty printing at present, because that's implemented in
rustc_middle
while the query provider is inrustc_const_eval
(which depends onrustc_middle
).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Other cases like this are typically addressed by non-query
dyn Trait
s or function pointers, rather than queries.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don't really have a good place/system to add such function pointers to
TyCtxt
yet. I could look into making it part of the wholeprovider
scheme.If that's desirable, I will do that, but this PR should be landed quickly so we can have a small patch to beta, instead of a larger change (even if benign)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well,
lint_store
and formerlycstore
lived right inGlobalCtxt
.This PR seems fine for backport, though.