Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use unwinding crate for unwinding on Xous platform #117072

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Dec 6, 2023

Conversation

xobs
Copy link
Contributor

@xobs xobs commented Oct 23, 2023

This patch adds support for using unwinding on platforms where libunwinding isn't viable. An example of such a platform is riscv32imac-unknown-xous-elf.

Background

The Rust project maintains a fork of llvm at llvm-project where it applies patches on top of the llvm project. This mostly seems to be to get unwinding support for the SGX project, and there may be other patches that I'm unaware of.

There is a lot of machinery in the build system to support compiling libunwind on other platforms, and I needed to add additional patches to llvm in order to add support for Xous.

Rather than continuing down this path, it seemed much easier to use a Rust-based library. The unwinding crate by @nbdd0121 fits this description perfectly.

Future work

This could potentially replace the custom patches for libunwind on other platforms such as SGX, and could enable unwinding support on many more exotic platforms.

Anti-goals

This is not designed to replace libunwind on tier-one platforms or those where unwinding support already exists. There is already a well-established approach for unwinding there. Instead, this aims to enable unwinding on new platforms where C++ code may be difficult to compile.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 23, 2023

r? @cuviper

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Oct 23, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 23, 2023

These commits modify compiler targets.
(See the Target Tier Policy.)

These commits modify the Cargo.lock file. Unintentional changes to Cargo.lock can be introduced when switching branches and rebasing PRs.

If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged.
Otherwise, you can ignore this comment.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) labels Oct 23, 2023
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 23, 2023

These commits modify the Cargo.lock file. Unintentional changes to Cargo.lock can be introduced when switching branches and rebasing PRs.

If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged.
Otherwise, you can ignore this comment.

These commits modify compiler targets.
(See the Target Tier Policy.)

Third-party dependency whitelist may have been modified! You must ensure that any new dependencies have compatible licenses before merging.

cc @davidtwco, @wesleywiser

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@cuviper
Copy link
Member

cuviper commented Oct 27, 2023

I'm nominating this for libs team discussion, both because std dependencies are not taken lightly, and because this may also set precedent for other targets.

@cuviper cuviper added the I-libs-nominated Nominated for discussion during a libs team meeting. label Oct 27, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 5, 2023

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #117504) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@xobs
Copy link
Contributor Author

xobs commented Nov 5, 2023

rebased to follow the removal of cc as a dependency within unwinding.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 8, 2023

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #117716) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

Cargo.lock Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@rustbot rustbot added the T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Nov 9, 2023
@xobs
Copy link
Contributor Author

xobs commented Nov 9, 2023

Forced push changes that:

  • follow the renaming of compiler/rustc_target/src/spec -> compiler/rustc_target/src/spec/targets
  • bump unwinding to 0.2.1
  • remove the second copy of gimli from Cargo.lock

@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
#![allow(nonstandard_style)]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Most of these are available from unwinding::abi, can this be used instead?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The problem is that the callee uses raw pointers, so most of the functions here are casting pointers to references. The calling code could be modified to use references rather than pointers, but I didn't want to touch such fundamental structures.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's fine then. But at least change the pub fn to pub unsafe fn since they accept raw pointers.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Alright, I've changed the signatures and verified that it still works.

@Amanieu Amanieu removed the I-libs-nominated Nominated for discussion during a libs team meeting. label Nov 15, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

The `unwinding` crate supports processing unwinding data, and is written
entirely in Rust. This allows it to be ported to new platforms more
easily than using the llvm-based `libunwind`.

While `libunwind` is very well supported on major targets, it is
difficult to use on other targets. SGX is an example of this where Rust
carries custom patches in order to enable backtrace support.

This adds an alternative for supported architectures. Rather than
providing a custom target, `unwinding` allows for a solution that is
completely written in Rust.

This adds `xous` as the first consumer, and forthcoming patches will
modify libstd to take advantage of this.

Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <[email protected]>
Now that `unwind` supports Xous, enable unwinding panics on Xous.

Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <[email protected]>
Xous as an operating system is compiled with gcc-type personalities when
it comes to unwinding. This enables unwinding inside panics on Xous,
which enables Rust tests.

Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <[email protected]>
Now that everything is in place to support unwinding on Xous, enable
this for that target.

Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <[email protected]>
Add `unwinding` as a dependency. This is required on platforms where
unwinding isn't provided by llvm.

Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <[email protected]>
The main() function takes an argument that contains the eh_frame
address. Implement `unwinding` support by looking for unwinding data at
this address.

Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <[email protected]>
Add `unwinding` as a permitted dependency of rustc, as it is now used as
part of panic unwinding within platforms such as Xous.

Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <[email protected]>
@cuviper
Copy link
Member

cuviper commented Dec 6, 2023

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 6, 2023

📌 Commit 0773afc has been approved by cuviper

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 6, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 6, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 0773afc with merge 84a554c...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 6, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: cuviper
Pushing 84a554c to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 6, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 84a554c into rust-lang:master Dec 6, 2023
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.76.0 milestone Dec 6, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (84a554c): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.1% [-0.1%, -0.1%] 3
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.7% [1.7%, 1.7%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.2% [1.2%, 1.2%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 1.7% [1.7%, 1.7%] 1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.3% [-2.4%, -2.1%] 4
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 675.395s -> 673.722s (-0.25%)
Artifact size: 314.15 MiB -> 314.15 MiB (0.00%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants