-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
the unadjusted ABI needs to pass aggregates by-value #118127
Conversation
r? @davidtwco (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
Could you just add a test that uses the NEON intrinsic and ensures it doesn't fail to compile? |
I can probably do a no_core test that works on all hosts... |
Is the unadjusted ABI marked as internal feature? If not I think we should mark it as such. |
Not currently: rust/compiler/rustc_feature/src/unstable.rs Lines 162 to 163 in efe54e2
But I agree. |
I added a test. |
…l, r=petrochenkov make the 'abi_unadjusted' feature internal As [suggested](rust-lang#118127 (comment)) by `@bjorn3.`
Rollup merge of rust-lang#118167 - RalfJung:unadjusted-abi-is-internal, r=petrochenkov make the 'abi_unadjusted' feature internal As [suggested](rust-lang#118127 (comment)) by `@bjorn3.`
@davidtwco or anyone else from @rust-lang/compiler , this fixes a critical codegen regression, would be good to land it ASAP. :) |
@bors r+ rollup=never p=1 easier to bisect that way |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (16087ee): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 675.133s -> 674.958s (-0.03%) |
Fixes #118124, a regression introduced in #117500