syms for legacy numeric constants diag items

[pitaj]

Missed these in #121272 and #121361, woops.

For rust-lang/rust-clippy#12312

r? @Nilstrieb

[Noratrieb]

@bors r+ rollup

[bors]

📌 Commit 2ea3322 has been approved by Nilstrieb

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 2ea3322 with merge 1c28a2c...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Nilstrieb
Pushing 1c28a2c to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (1c28a2c): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDED

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.5%	[0.3%, 1.1%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.3%, -0.2%]	2
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.8%	[-1.5%, -0.2%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.3%, -0.2%]	2

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.5%	[0.5%, 0.5%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.1%	[1.4%, 5.9%]	10
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.8%	[-1.8%, -1.8%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.5%	[-5.4%, -2.1%]	4
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.6%	[-1.8%, 0.5%]	2

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.1%	[-2.1%, -2.1%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 651.218s -> 650.944s (-0.04%)
Artifact size: 311.14 MiB -> 311.12 MiB (-0.01%)

[Mark-Simulacrum]

Regression seems likely to be noise (bimodality) or not significant enough to investigate further. Marking as triaged. Some of the improvements seem genuine.