Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make type_ascribe! not a built-in #122806

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2024
Merged

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

The only weird thing is the macro expansion note. I wonder if we should suppress these 🤔

r? @fmease since you told me about builtin# lol

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 21, 2024
Copy link
Member

@fmease fmease left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Strong!
r=me with or without nits addressed at your convenience

compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=fmease rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 21, 2024

📌 Commit a015b90 has been approved by fmease

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 21, 2024
@fmease
Copy link
Member

fmease commented Mar 21, 2024

The only weird thing is the macro expansion note. I wonder if we should suppress these 🤔

Not worth it imo. Can be done at some other point once ppl using e.g. offset_of! complain about it.

matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2024
…ease

Make `type_ascribe!` not a built-in

The only weird thing is the macro expansion note. I wonder if we should suppress these 🤔

r? `@fmease` since you told me about builtin# lol
workingjubilee added a commit to workingjubilee/rustc that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2024
…ease

Make `type_ascribe!` not a built-in

The only weird thing is the macro expansion note. I wonder if we should suppress these 🤔

r? ``@fmease`` since you told me about builtin# lol
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2024
…kingjubilee

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#122222 (deref patterns: bare-bones feature gate and typechecking)
 - rust-lang#122456 (CFI: Skip non-passed arguments)
 - rust-lang#122696 (Add bare metal riscv32 target.)
 - rust-lang#122771 (add some comments to hir::ModuleItems)
 - rust-lang#122773 (make "expected paren or brace" error translatable)
 - rust-lang#122795 (Inherit `RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP` when testing wasm)
 - rust-lang#122799 (Replace closures with `_` when suggesting fully qualified path for method call)
 - rust-lang#122801 (Fix misc printing issues in emit=stable_mir)
 - rust-lang#122806 (Make `type_ascribe!` not a built-in)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2024
…ease

Make `type_ascribe!` not a built-in

The only weird thing is the macro expansion note. I wonder if we should suppress these 🤔

r? ```@fmease``` since you told me about builtin# lol
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#122222 (deref patterns: bare-bones feature gate and typechecking)
 - rust-lang#122358 (Don't ICE when encountering bound regions in generator interior type)
 - rust-lang#122696 (Add bare metal riscv32 target.)
 - rust-lang#122773 (make "expected paren or brace" error translatable)
 - rust-lang#122795 (Inherit `RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP` when testing wasm)
 - rust-lang#122799 (Replace closures with `_` when suggesting fully qualified path for method call)
 - rust-lang#122801 (Fix misc printing issues in emit=stable_mir)
 - rust-lang#122806 (Make `type_ascribe!` not a built-in)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#122771 (add some comments to hir::ModuleItems)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 62e414d into rust-lang:master Mar 21, 2024
11 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#122806 - compiler-errors:type-ascribe, r=fmease

Make `type_ascribe!` not a built-in

The only weird thing is the macro expansion note. I wonder if we should suppress these 🤔

r? ````@fmease```` since you told me about builtin# lol
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.79.0 milestone Mar 21, 2024
fmease added a commit to fmease/rust that referenced this pull request May 3, 2024
…yn, r=compiler-errors

AST pretty: Use `builtin_syntax` for type ascription

Follow-up to rust-lang#122806.
CC #124619.
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request May 3, 2024
…yn, r=compiler-errors

AST pretty: Use `builtin_syntax` for type ascription

Follow-up to rust-lang#122806.
CC #124619.
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 3, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#124637 - fmease:ast-pretty-ty-asc-builtin-syn, r=compiler-errors

AST pretty: Use `builtin_syntax` for type ascription

Follow-up to rust-lang#122806.
CC #124619.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants