Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 4 pull requests #126540

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jun 16, 2024
Merged

Rollup of 4 pull requests #126540

merged 8 commits into from
Jun 16, 2024

Conversation

jhpratt
Copy link
Member

@jhpratt jhpratt commented Jun 16, 2024

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

tbu- and others added 8 commits May 21, 2024 07:56
The behavior makes sense because `Path::new("one_component").parent() ==
Some(Path::new(""))`, so if one naively wants to create the parent
directory for a file to be written, it simply works.

Closes rust-lang#105108 by documenting the current behavior.
Due to rust-lang#125954, we had to modify git invocations with
certain flags in rust-lang#126255. However, because there are so many
instances of `Command::new("git")` in bootstrap, it is difficult to apply these solutions to all of
them.

This PR creates a helper function that unifies the git usage in bootstrap. Meaning, whenever special flags
or hacks are needed, we can apply them to this single function which makes things much simpler for the bootstrap team.

Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <[email protected]>
Clarify the language wrt `race condition` not meaning `memory unsafety`.
…olnay

Document behavior of `create_dir_all` wrt. empty path

The behavior makes sense because `Path::new("one_component").parent() == Some(Path::new(""))`, so if one naively wants to create the parent directory for a file to be written, it simply works.

Closes rust-lang#105108 by documenting the current behavior.
…elix

Spell out other trait diagnostic

I recently saw somebody confused about the diagnostic thinking it was suggesting to add an `as` cast. This change is longer but I think it's clearer
…r=Kobzol

unify git command preperation

Due to rust-lang#125954, we had to modify git invocations with certain flags in rust-lang#126255. However, because there are so many instances of `Command::new("git")` in bootstrap, it is difficult to apply these solutions to all of them.

This PR creates a helper function that unifies the git usage in bootstrap. Meaning, whenever special flags or hacks are needed, we can apply them to this single function which makes things much simpler for the bootstrap team.
Update `Arc::try_unwrap()` docs

Clarify the language wrt "race condition" not meaning "memory unsafety".

The docs make an important point about a 'logical' race condition that can occur if the `Err`-case in `Arc::try_unwrap()` is not handled properly. The language as is uses the term "race condition", which the reader may associate with "memory unsafety". This PR tries to clarify the scenario and qualify "race condition without memory unsafety".
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Jun 16, 2024
@jhpratt
Copy link
Member Author

jhpratt commented Jun 16, 2024

@bors r+ rollup=never p=4

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 16, 2024

📌 Commit 623cf23 has been approved by jhpratt

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 16, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 16, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 623cf23 with merge 12b33d3...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 16, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jhpratt
Pushing 12b33d3 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jun 16, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 12b33d3 into rust-lang:master Jun 16, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.81.0 milestone Jun 16, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Message Perf Build Sha
#125112 Document behavior of create_dir_all wrt. empty path 4481b6cdf8ee329f13721c3aff426816fd659db7 (link)
#126127 Spell out other trait diagnostic 4c96f567abfea2c081da0f0e4cdb6251edcc3123 (link)
#126309 unify git command preperation 28e284e471378814e7e22294eeb5ffa71affbe23 (link)
#126539 Update Arc::try_unwrap() docs 78dcc1ee69b458c105ea82b6f12384d185ec9072 (link)

previous master: 5639c21fb3

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (12b33d3): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.9% [0.2%, 2.3%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 1.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.1% [1.1%, 1.1%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 1.1% [1.1%, 1.1%] 1

Cycles

Results (secondary -2.4%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.4% [-2.4%, -2.4%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 671.71s -> 672.776s (0.16%)
Artifact size: 320.54 MiB -> 319.83 MiB (-0.22%)

@jhpratt jhpratt deleted the rollup-fzzz8j3 branch June 17, 2024 00:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants