Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a test for trait solver overflow in MIR inliner cycle detection #129757

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 31, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
32 changes: 32 additions & 0 deletions tests/mir-opt/inline/type_overflow.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
// This is a regression test for one of the problems in #128887; it checks that the
// strategy in #129714 avoids trait solver overflows in this specific case.

// skip-filecheck
//@ compile-flags: -Zinline-mir

pub trait Foo {
type Associated;
type Chain: Foo<Associated = Self::Associated>;
}

trait FooExt {
fn do_ext() {}
}
impl<T: Foo<Associated = f64>> FooExt for T {}

#[allow(unconditional_recursion)]
fn recurse<T: Foo<Associated = f64>>() {
T::do_ext();
recurse::<T::Chain>();
}

macro_rules! emit {
($($m:ident)*) => {$(
pub fn $m<T: Foo<Associated = f64>>() {
recurse::<T>();
}
)*}
}

// Increase the chance of triggering the bug
emit!(m00 m01 m02 m03 m04 m05 m06 m07 m08 m09 m10 m11 m12 m13 m14 m15 m16 m17 m18 m19);
Loading