Rollup of 3 pull requests

[Zalathar]

Successful merges:

• make basic allocation functions track_caller in Miri for nicer backtraces #130245 (make basic allocation functions track_caller in Miri for nicer backtraces)
• skip target sanity check when it's a local-rebuild #130261 (skip target sanity check when it's a local-rebuild)
• rustdoc: rename issue-\d+.rs tests to have meaningful names (part 9) #130287 (rustdoc: rename issue-\d+.rs tests to have meaningful names (part 9))

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

[Zalathar]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

[bors]

📌 Commit 1c23c8b has been approved by Zalathar

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 1c23c8b with merge 473ae00...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Zalathar
Pushing 473ae00 to master...

[rust-timer]

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#	Message	Perf Build Sha
#130245	make basic allocation functions track_caller in Miri for ni…	476820c985f41561e589a725e83746c044767dab (link)
#130261	skip target sanity check when it's a local-rebuild	10e5c7e1347773b68f664a712758155fa12796d8 (link)
#130287	rustdoc: rename issue-\d+.rs tests to have meaningful nam…	ef74cd8d842162afd1926b6f427381cafb20a321 (link)

previous master: 5e842953cc

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (473ae00): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.2%	[0.2%, 0.2%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.5%	[-0.5%, -0.5%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 2.9%, secondary 2.4%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.9%	[2.9%, 2.9%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.4%	[1.2%, 3.6%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.9%	[2.9%, 2.9%]	1

Cycles

Results (secondary 0.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.4%	[2.4%, 2.4%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.1%	[-2.1%, -2.1%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 757.063s -> 757.647s (0.08%)
Artifact size: 341.17 MiB -> 341.27 MiB (0.03%)