Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: skipping (obvious) details here is worth making this more nice t… #31585

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2016
Merged

doc: skipping (obvious) details here is worth making this more nice t… #31585

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2016

Conversation

tshepang
Copy link
Member

…o read

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ impl<T> Vec<T> {
}

/// Inserts an element at position `index` within the vector, shifting all
/// elements after position `i` one position to the right.
/// elements after the position to the right.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I found this sentence hard to parse, not realizing "the postion" was referencing that from the previous sentence. What about "shifting all elements after it to the right"?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Feb 12, 2016

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 12, 2016

📌 Commit 0352bdf has been approved by brson

@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Feb 12, 2016

@bors rollup

steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2016
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2016
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2016
@bors bors merged commit 0352bdf into rust-lang:master Feb 14, 2016
@tshepang tshepang deleted the over-explanation branch February 15, 2016 07:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants