-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
parser: do not try to continue with unsafe
on foreign fns
#33336
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
r? @sfackler (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
you need to update the |
Thanks! I'll freely admit I didn't want to wait for the tests locally to find these :) |
The changed line makes it look like `unsafe` is allowed, but the first statement of `parse_item_foreign_fn` is: `self.expect_keyword(keywords::Fn)?;` So we get the strange "expected one of `fn`, `pub`, `static`, or `unsafe`, found `unsafe`". Fixes: rust-lang#27361
Yea, it would be great if we got emails from travis... |
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit b75f81c has been approved by |
steveklabnik
added a commit
to steveklabnik/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 5, 2016
parser: do not try to continue with `unsafe` on foreign fns The changed line makes it look like `unsafe` is allowed, but the first statement of `parse_item_foreign_fn` is: ``` self.expect_keyword(keywords::Fn)?; ``` So we get the strange "expected one of `fn`, `pub`, `static`, or `unsafe`, found `unsafe`". Fixes: rust-lang#27361
steveklabnik
added a commit
to steveklabnik/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 5, 2016
parser: do not try to continue with `unsafe` on foreign fns The changed line makes it look like `unsafe` is allowed, but the first statement of `parse_item_foreign_fn` is: ``` self.expect_keyword(keywords::Fn)?; ``` So we get the strange "expected one of `fn`, `pub`, `static`, or `unsafe`, found `unsafe`". Fixes: rust-lang#27361
steveklabnik
added a commit
to steveklabnik/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 5, 2016
parser: do not try to continue with `unsafe` on foreign fns The changed line makes it look like `unsafe` is allowed, but the first statement of `parse_item_foreign_fn` is: ``` self.expect_keyword(keywords::Fn)?; ``` So we get the strange "expected one of `fn`, `pub`, `static`, or `unsafe`, found `unsafe`". Fixes: rust-lang#27361
steveklabnik
added a commit
to steveklabnik/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2016
parser: do not try to continue with `unsafe` on foreign fns The changed line makes it look like `unsafe` is allowed, but the first statement of `parse_item_foreign_fn` is: ``` self.expect_keyword(keywords::Fn)?; ``` So we get the strange "expected one of `fn`, `pub`, `static`, or `unsafe`, found `unsafe`". Fixes: rust-lang#27361
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2016
parser: do not try to continue with `unsafe` on foreign fns The changed line makes it look like `unsafe` is allowed, but the first statement of `parse_item_foreign_fn` is: ``` self.expect_keyword(keywords::Fn)?; ``` So we get the strange "expected one of `fn`, `pub`, `static`, or `unsafe`, found `unsafe`". Fixes: rust-lang#27361
steveklabnik
added a commit
to steveklabnik/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2016
parser: do not try to continue with `unsafe` on foreign fns The changed line makes it look like `unsafe` is allowed, but the first statement of `parse_item_foreign_fn` is: ``` self.expect_keyword(keywords::Fn)?; ``` So we get the strange "expected one of `fn`, `pub`, `static`, or `unsafe`, found `unsafe`". Fixes: rust-lang#27361
steveklabnik
added a commit
to steveklabnik/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2016
parser: do not try to continue with `unsafe` on foreign fns The changed line makes it look like `unsafe` is allowed, but the first statement of `parse_item_foreign_fn` is: ``` self.expect_keyword(keywords::Fn)?; ``` So we get the strange "expected one of `fn`, `pub`, `static`, or `unsafe`, found `unsafe`". Fixes: rust-lang#27361
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2016
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The changed line makes it look like
unsafe
is allowed, but the first statement ofparse_item_foreign_fn
is:So we get the strange "expected one of
fn
,pub
,static
, orunsafe
, foundunsafe
".Fixes: #27361