Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update E0116 to new error code format. #35467

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2016
Merged

Update E0116 to new error code format. #35467

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2016

Conversation

terrynsun
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #35249 as part of #35233.

r? @jonathandturner

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @jonathandturner (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@@ -33,10 +33,13 @@ struct OrphanChecker<'cx, 'tcx:'cx> {
impl<'cx, 'tcx> OrphanChecker<'cx, 'tcx> {
fn check_def_id(&self, item: &hir::Item, def_id: DefId) {
if def_id.krate != LOCAL_CRATE {
span_err!(self.tcx.sess, item.span, E0116,
struct_span_err!(self.tcx.sess, item.span, E0116,
"cannot define inherent `impl` for a type outside of the \
crate where the type is defined; define and implement \
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you remove the "; define and implement a trait or new type instead" from the error title?

@sophiajt
Copy link
Contributor

sophiajt commented Aug 7, 2016

Thanks for the PR!

This looks really close. I made a comment on the one part that still needs to be updated. After that, squash down to 1 commit, and I think we'll be ready to go.

@terrynsun
Copy link
Contributor Author

Got it!

@sophiajt
Copy link
Contributor

sophiajt commented Aug 7, 2016

Looks good!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 7, 2016

📌 Commit 03dc484 has been approved by jonathandturner

sophiajt pushed a commit to sophiajt/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2016
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2016
@bors bors merged commit 03dc484 into rust-lang:master Aug 7, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants