Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 15 pull requests #37670

Merged
merged 39 commits into from
Nov 9, 2016
Merged

Rollup of 15 pull requests #37670

merged 39 commits into from
Nov 9, 2016

Conversation

liigo and others added 30 commits October 25, 2016 17:12
…fmt::Write

Various existing code does this, but the documentation doesn't explain
how to do it.
Provide either a span pointing to the original definition of missing
trait items, or a message with the inferred definitions.
KNOWN_ATTRIBUTES should really be named BUILT_ATTRIBUTES,
while KNOWN_ATTRIBUTES should be used to mark attributes
as known, similar to USED_ATTRIBUTES.
This speeds up compilation by 3--6% across most of rustc-benchmarks.
By using a second attribute `attributes(Bar)` on
proc_macro_derive, whitelist any attributes with
the name `Bar` in the deriving item. This allows
a proc_macro function to use custom attribtues
without a custom attribute error or unused attribute
lint.
This reverts commit 3784067.
Any errors in the derived output now point at the derive attribute
instead of the item.
This commit vendors all dependencies when using rustbuild to ensure that we
don't hit the network during a build and can build as a self-contained unit.
A few changes are included here:

* The `winapi` and `url` dependencies were dropped. The source code for these
  projects is pretty weighty, and we're about to vendor them, so let's not
  commit to that intake just yet. If necessary we can vendor them later but for
  now it shouldn't be necessary.

* The `--frozen` flag is now always passed to Cargo, obviating the need for
  tidy's `cargo_lock` check.

* Tidy was updated to not check the vendor directory

Closes rust-lang#34687
Avoid a reallocation in CString::from and CStr::to_owned.
Given the following code:

```rust
struct Foo<T: Clone>(T);

use std::ops::Add;

impl<T: Clone, Add> Add for Foo<T> {
    type Output = usize;

    fn add(self, rhs: Self) -> Self::Output {
      unimplemented!();
    }
}
```

present the following output:

```nocode
error[E0404]: `Add` is not a trait
 --> file3.rs:5:21
  |
5 | impl<T: Clone, Add> Add for Okok<T> {
  |                ---  ^^^ expected trait, found type parameter
  |                |
  |                type parameter defined here
```
Partially stabilize RFC 1506 "Clarify relationships between ADTs"

Lifted restrictions on tuple structs/variants are stabilized, i.e. `S{..}` can be used with any structs and empty tuple structs are permitted without feature gate.
Numeric fields in struct expressions/patterns `S { 0: a, 1: b }` are **NOT** stabilized.
This was implemented 1.5 months ago in Rust 1.12, but this is a tiny technical change that could probably go even without RFC/stabilization period.

cc rust-lang#35626 rust-lang#36871
r? @nikomatsakis
…klabnik

Print more tags in rustdoc

r? @steveklabnik

cc @frewsxcv

A little screenshot:

<img width="1440" alt="screen shot 2016-10-13 at 01 41 53" src="https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3050060/19331745/873cd71e-90e6-11e6-88f8-715668366a3f.png">
Replace FNV with a faster hash function.

Hash table lookups are very hot in rustc profiles and the time taken within `FnvHash` itself is a big part of that. Although FNV is a simple hash, it processes its input one byte at a time. In contrast, Firefox has a homespun hash function that is also simple but works on multiple bytes at a time. So I tried it out and the results are compelling:

```
futures-rs-test  4.326s vs  4.212s --> 1.027x faster (variance: 1.001x, 1.007x)
helloworld       0.233s vs  0.232s --> 1.004x faster (variance: 1.037x, 1.016x)
html5ever-2016-  5.397s vs  5.210s --> 1.036x faster (variance: 1.009x, 1.006x)
hyper.0.5.0      5.018s vs  4.905s --> 1.023x faster (variance: 1.007x, 1.006x)
inflate-0.1.0    4.889s vs  4.872s --> 1.004x faster (variance: 1.012x, 1.007x)
issue-32062-equ  0.347s vs  0.335s --> 1.035x faster (variance: 1.033x, 1.019x)
issue-32278-big  1.717s vs  1.622s --> 1.059x faster (variance: 1.027x, 1.028x)
jld-day15-parse  1.537s vs  1.459s --> 1.054x faster (variance: 1.005x, 1.003x)
piston-image-0. 11.863s vs 11.482s --> 1.033x faster (variance: 1.060x, 1.002x)
regex.0.1.30     2.517s vs  2.453s --> 1.026x faster (variance: 1.011x, 1.013x)
rust-encoding-0  2.080s vs  2.047s --> 1.016x faster (variance: 1.005x, 1.005x)
syntex-0.42.2   32.268s vs 31.275s --> 1.032x faster (variance: 1.014x, 1.022x)
syntex-0.42.2-i 17.629s vs 16.559s --> 1.065x faster (variance: 1.013x, 1.021x)
```

(That's a stage1 compiler doing debug builds. Results for a stage2 compiler are similar.)

The attached commit is not in a state suitable for landing because I changed the implementation of FnvHasher without changing its name (because that would have required touching many lines in the compiler). Nonetheless, it is a good place to start discussions.

Profiles show very clearly that this new hash function is a lot faster to compute than FNV. The quality of the new hash function is less clear -- it seems to do better in some cases and worse in others (judging by the number of instructions executed in `Hash{Map,Set}::get`).

CC @brson, @arthurprs
…abnik

rustdoc: mark unsafe fns in module page with superscript icons

Note: I'v changed the mark style. Now use superscript ⚠(U+26A0) (the old one is '[Unsafe]' literal).
Basically per https://botbot.me/mozilla/rust-docs/2016-10-19/?msg=75112017&page=1

![unsafe-fn-icon](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/346530/19633650/7f6e1eea-99e6-11e6-8d09-31aec83e46a5.png)

![unsafe-fn](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/346530/19472050/39daded2-9558-11e6-9148-3cb12afd1c9a.png)
…-back, r=nikomatsakis

Include type of missing trait methods in error

Provide either a span pointing to the original definition of missing
trait items, or a message with the inferred definitions.

Fixes rust-lang#24626. Follow up to PR rust-lang#36371.

If PR rust-lang#37369 lands, missing trait items that present a multiline span will be able to show the entirety of the item definition on the error itself, instead of just the first line.
…=sanxiyn

Point to type argument span when used as trait

Given the following code:

``` rust
struct Foo<T: Clone>(T);

use std::ops::Add;

impl<T: Clone, Add> Add for Foo<T> {
  type Output = usize;

  fn add(self, rhs: Self) -> Self::Output {
    unimplemented!();
  }
}
```

present the following output:

``` nocode
error[E0404]: `Add` is not a trait
 --> file3.rs:5:21
  |
5 | impl<T: Clone, Add> Add for Okok<T> {
  |                ---  ^^^ expected trait, found type parameter
  |                |
  |                type parameter defined here
```

Fixes rust-lang#35987.
macros 1.1: Allow proc_macro functions to declare attributes to be mark as used

This PR allows proc macro functions to declare attribute names that should be marked as used when attached to the deriving item. There are a few questions for this PR.

- Currently this uses a separate attribute named `#[proc_macro_attributes(..)]`, is this the best choice?
- In order to make this work, the `check_attribute` function had to be modified to not error on attributes marked as used. This is a pretty large change in semantics, is there a better way to do this?
- I've got a few clones where I don't know if I need them (like turning `item` into a `TokenStream`), can these be avoided?
- Is switching to `MultiItemDecorator` the right thing here?

Also fixes rust-lang#37563.
Slightly optimise CString

Avoid a reallocation in CString::from and CStr::to_owned.
…frewsxcv

Add missing urls and few local rewrites

r? @steveklabnik
Marking the 'no-stack-check' codegen option as deprecated (Issue rust-lang#34915)

Attempts to finish resolving issue rust-lang#34915. Based on pull request rust-lang#35156, which was closed due to inactivity.
save-analysis: don't choke on stripped doc attributes
…komatsakis

ICH: Add tests for let- and match-expressions.

r? @nikomatsakis
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@eddyb
Copy link
Member Author

eddyb commented Nov 9, 2016

@bors r+ p=100

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 9, 2016

📌 Commit 60c74b7 has been approved by eddyb

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 9, 2016

⌛ Testing commit 60c74b7 with merge da2ce22...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2016
Rollup of 15 pull requests

- Successful merges: #36868, #37134, #37229, #37250, #37370, #37428, #37432, #37472, #37524, #37614, #37622, #37627, #37636, #37644, #37654
- Failed merges: #37463, #37542, #37645
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.