Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bootstrap: fix minor comment typos in lib.rs #42140

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 22, 2017

Conversation

anderspapitto
Copy link
Contributor

I noticed these while reading through the build system
documentation. They're hardly worth fixing, but I'm also using this to
get my feet wet with the rustc contribution system.

I noticed these while reading through the build system
documentation. They're hardly worth fixing, but I'm also using this to
get my feet wet with the rustc contribution system.
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 21, 2017

📌 Commit 558dd9c has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 21, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 558dd9c with merge d213d09...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 21, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-travis

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors retry

  • timeout

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 22, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 558dd9c with merge 41976e2...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2017
bootstrap: fix minor comment typos in lib.rs

I noticed these while reading through the build system
documentation. They're hardly worth fixing, but I'm also using this to
get my feet wet with the rustc contribution system.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 22, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing 41976e2 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 558dd9c into rust-lang:master May 22, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants