-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Amend option.take examples #52218
Amend option.take examples #52218
Conversation
It wasn't abundantly clear to me what `.take` returned. Perhaps this is a slightly frivolous change, but I think it's an improvement. =) Apologies if I'm not following proper procedures.
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @withoutboats (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
Ping from triage, @withoutboats: This PR requires your review. |
@bors r+ Looks like a nice docs improvement; thanks for the PR :) |
📌 Commit ede1a5d has been approved by |
@bors rollup |
Amend option.take examples It wasn't abundantly clear to me what `.take` returned. Perhaps this is a slightly frivolous change, but I think it's an improvement. =) Apologies if I'm not following proper procedures.
Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - #51628 (use checked write in `LineWriter` example) - #52116 (Handle array manually in str case conversion methods) - #52218 (Amend option.take examples) - #52418 (Do not use desugared ident when suggesting adding a type) - #52439 (Revert some changes from #51917 to fix custom libdir) - #52455 (Fix doc comment: use `?` instead of `.unwrap()`) - #52458 (rustc: Fix a suggestion for the `proc_macro` feature) - #52464 (Allow clippy to be installed with make install) - #52472 (rustc: Enable `use_extern_macros` in 2018 edition) - #52477 (Clarify short-circuiting behvaior of Iterator::zip.) - #52480 (Cleanup #24958) - #52487 (Don't build twice the sanitizers on Linux) - #52510 (rustdoc: remove FIXME about macro redirects) Failed merges: r? @ghost
It wasn't abundantly clear to me what
.take
returned. Perhaps this is a slightly frivolous change, but I think it's an improvement. =)Apologies if I'm not following proper procedures.