Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add a macro for static (compile-time) assertions #54958

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 12, 2018

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @matthewjasper

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 10, 2018
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Oct 10, 2018

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 10, 2018

📌 Commit a332387 has been approved by oli-obk

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 10, 2018
@leonardo-m
Copy link

Is this macro usable from the Prelude too? Something similar is useful in user code too.

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Oct 10, 2018

No, this is not meant for users. Users will get first class support for assert! and friends.

@RalfJung
Copy link
Member Author

@oli-obk you'd likely still want such a macro... I doubt assert!(foo); is going to work in item position?

Having to give the assertion a name though is rather ugly. Fine for internal use, not so for libstd.

Mark-Simulacrum added a commit to Mark-Simulacrum/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2018
add a macro for static (compile-time) assertions

Cc @oli-obk
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2018
add a macro for static (compile-time) assertions

Cc @oli-obk
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2018
Rollup of 16 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #54755 (Documents reference equality by address (#54197))
 - #54811 (During rustc bootstrap, make default for `optimize` independent of `debug`)
 - #54825 (NLL says "borrowed content" instead of more precise "dereference of raw pointer")
 - #54860 (Add doc comments about safest way to initialize a vector of zeros)
 - #54869 (Fix mobile docs)
 - #54891 (Fix tracking issue for Once::is_completed)
 - #54913 (doc fix: it's auto traits that make for automatic implementations)
 - #54920 (Fix handling of #[must_use] on unit and uninhabited types)
 - #54932 (A handful of random string-related improvements)
 - #54936 (impl Eq+Hash for TyLayout)
 - #54950 (std: Synchronize global allocator on wasm32)
 - #54956 ("(using ..." doesn't have the matching ")")
 - #54958 (add a macro for static (compile-time) assertions)
 - #54967 (Remove incorrect span for second label inner macro invocation)
 - #54983 (Fix slice's benchmarks)
 - #54989 (Fix spelling in the documentation to htmldocck.py)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit a332387 into rust-lang:master Oct 12, 2018
@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the static-assert branch November 9, 2018 15:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants