-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a note about 2018e if someone uses try {
in 2015e
#58555
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Feb 18, 2019
📌 Commit 9312ca1 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Feb 18, 2019
kennytm
added a commit
to kennytm/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2019
Add a note about 2018e if someone uses `try {` in 2015e Inspired by rust-lang#58491, where a `try_blocks` example was accidentally run in 2015, which of course produces a bunch of errors. What's the philosophy about gating for this? The keyword is stably a keyword in 2018, so I haven't gated it for now but am not mentioning what the keyword _does_. Let me know if I should do differently.
Mark-Simulacrum
added a commit
to Mark-Simulacrum/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2019
Add a note about 2018e if someone uses `try {` in 2015e Inspired by rust-lang#58491, where a `try_blocks` example was accidentally run in 2015, which of course produces a bunch of errors. What's the philosophy about gating for this? The keyword is stably a keyword in 2018, so I haven't gated it for now but am not mentioning what the keyword _does_. Let me know if I should do differently.
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2019
Add a note about 2018e if someone uses `try {` in 2015e Inspired by rust-lang#58491, where a `try_blocks` example was accidentally run in 2015, which of course produces a bunch of errors. What's the philosophy about gating for this? The keyword is stably a keyword in 2018, so I haven't gated it for now but am not mentioning what the keyword _does_. Let me know if I should do differently.
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 22, 2019
Add a note about 2018e if someone uses `try {` in 2015e Inspired by rust-lang#58491, where a `try_blocks` example was accidentally run in 2015, which of course produces a bunch of errors. What's the philosophy about gating for this? The keyword is stably a keyword in 2018, so I haven't gated it for now but am not mentioning what the keyword _does_. Let me know if I should do differently. Resolves rust-lang#53672
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 22, 2019
Add a note about 2018e if someone uses `try {` in 2015e Inspired by rust-lang#58491, where a `try_blocks` example was accidentally run in 2015, which of course produces a bunch of errors. What's the philosophy about gating for this? The keyword is stably a keyword in 2018, so I haven't gated it for now but am not mentioning what the keyword _does_. Let me know if I should do differently. Resolves rust-lang#53672
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 22, 2019
Rollup of 17 pull requests Successful merges: - #57656 (Deprecate the unstable Vec::resize_default) - #58059 (deprecate before_exec in favor of unsafe pre_exec) - #58064 (override `VecDeque::try_rfold`, also update iterator) - #58198 (Suggest removing parentheses surrounding lifetimes) - #58431 (fix overlapping references in BTree) - #58555 (Add a note about 2018e if someone uses `try {` in 2015e) - #58588 (remove a bit of dead code) - #58589 (cleanup macro after 2018 transition) - #58591 (Dedup a rustdoc diagnostic construction) - #58600 (fix small documentation typo) - #58601 (Search for target_triple.json only if builtin target not found) - #58606 (Docs: put Future trait into spotlight) - #58607 (Fixes #58586: Make E0505 erronous example fail for the 2018 edition) - #58615 (miri: explain why we use static alignment in ref-to-place conversion) - #58620 (introduce benchmarks of BTreeSet.intersection) - #58621 (Update miri links) - #58632 (Make std feature list sorted) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-diagnostics
Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Inspired by #58491, where a
try_blocks
example was accidentally run in 2015, which of course produces a bunch of errors.What's the philosophy about gating for this? The keyword is stably a keyword in 2018, so I haven't gated it for now but am not mentioning what the keyword does. Let me know if I should do differently.
Resolves #53672