-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Simplify checked_duration_since #59374
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
r? @shepmaster (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Mar 22, 2019
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit 1ccad16 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Mar 25, 2019
/cc @alexcrichton as reviewer of the previous PR |
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 26, 2019
…ce, r=shepmaster Simplify checked_duration_since This follows the same design as we updated to in rust-lang#56490. Internally, all the system specific time implementations are checked, no panics. Then the panicking publicly exported API can just call the checked version of itself and make do with a single panic (`expect`) at the top. Since the internal sys implementations are now checked, this gets rid of the extra `if self >= &earlier` check in `checked_duration_since`. Except likely making the generated machine code simpler, it also reduces the algorithm from "Check panic condition -> call possibly panicking method" to just "call non panicking method". Added two test cases: * Edge case: Make sure `checked_duration_since` on two equal `Instant`s produce a zero duration, not a `None`. * Most common/intended usage: Make sure `later.checked_duration_since(earlier)`, returns an expected value.
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 26, 2019
…ce, r=shepmaster Simplify checked_duration_since This follows the same design as we updated to in rust-lang#56490. Internally, all the system specific time implementations are checked, no panics. Then the panicking publicly exported API can just call the checked version of itself and make do with a single panic (`expect`) at the top. Since the internal sys implementations are now checked, this gets rid of the extra `if self >= &earlier` check in `checked_duration_since`. Except likely making the generated machine code simpler, it also reduces the algorithm from "Check panic condition -> call possibly panicking method" to just "call non panicking method". Added two test cases: * Edge case: Make sure `checked_duration_since` on two equal `Instant`s produce a zero duration, not a `None`. * Most common/intended usage: Make sure `later.checked_duration_since(earlier)`, returns an expected value.
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 26, 2019
…ce, r=shepmaster Simplify checked_duration_since This follows the same design as we updated to in rust-lang#56490. Internally, all the system specific time implementations are checked, no panics. Then the panicking publicly exported API can just call the checked version of itself and make do with a single panic (`expect`) at the top. Since the internal sys implementations are now checked, this gets rid of the extra `if self >= &earlier` check in `checked_duration_since`. Except likely making the generated machine code simpler, it also reduces the algorithm from "Check panic condition -> call possibly panicking method" to just "call non panicking method". Added two test cases: * Edge case: Make sure `checked_duration_since` on two equal `Instant`s produce a zero duration, not a `None`. * Most common/intended usage: Make sure `later.checked_duration_since(earlier)`, returns an expected value.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 26, 2019
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - #59150 (Expand suggestions for type ascription parse errors) - #59232 (Merge `Promoted` and `Static` in `mir::Place`) - #59267 (Provide suggestion when using field access instead of path) - #59315 (Add no_hash to query macro and move some queries over) - #59334 (Update build instructions in README.md) - #59362 (Demo `FromIterator` short-circuiting) - #59374 (Simplify checked_duration_since) - #59389 (replace redundant note in deprecation warning) - #59410 (Clarify `{Ord,f32,f64}::clamp` docs a little) - #59419 (Utilize `?` instead of `return None`.) Failed merges: r? @ghost
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 26, 2019
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - #59150 (Expand suggestions for type ascription parse errors) - #59232 (Merge `Promoted` and `Static` in `mir::Place`) - #59267 (Provide suggestion when using field access instead of path) - #59315 (Add no_hash to query macro and move some queries over) - #59334 (Update build instructions in README.md) - #59362 (Demo `FromIterator` short-circuiting) - #59374 (Simplify checked_duration_since) - #59389 (replace redundant note in deprecation warning) - #59410 (Clarify `{Ord,f32,f64}::clamp` docs a little) - #59419 (Utilize `?` instead of `return None`.) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This follows the same design as we updated to in #56490. Internally, all the system specific time implementations are checked, no panics. Then the panicking publicly exported API can just call the checked version of itself and make do with a single panic (
expect
) at the top.Since the internal sys implementations are now checked, this gets rid of the extra
if self >= &earlier
check inchecked_duration_since
. Except likely making the generated machine code simpler, it also reduces the algorithm from "Check panic condition -> call possibly panicking method" to just "call non panicking method".Added two test cases:
checked_duration_since
on two equalInstant
s produce a zero duration, not aNone
.later.checked_duration_since(earlier)
, returns an expected value.