-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Only call the closure parameter of Iterator::is_sorted_by_key once per item #62473
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
r? @aidanhs (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Jul 7, 2019
r? @scottmcm |
scottmcm
reviewed
Jul 7, 2019
Well, this seems reasonable to me and the signature change is unstable so if libs is unhappy with it we can always revert it 🙃, so @bors r+ |
📌 Commit 98b54fb has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Jul 8, 2019
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 8, 2019
Only call the closure parameter of Iterator::is_sorted_by_key once per item See #53485 (comment). This changes `Iterator::is_sorted_by_key` to only call the given closure once for each item, which allows us to pass the items to the closure by value instead of by reference. **Important**: `is_sorted_by_key` for slices and slice iterators is now no longer implemented in terms of the custom `slice::Iter::is_sorted_by` implementation. It's a trade-off: we could forward `slice::Iter::is_sorted_by_key` to it directly for potential SIMD benefits, but that would mean that the closure is potentially called twice for (almost) every element of the slice.
☀️ Test successful - checks-azure, checks-travis, status-appveyor |
10 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors
This PR was explicitly merged by bors.
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See #53485 (comment).
This changes
Iterator::is_sorted_by_key
to only call the given closure once for each item, which allows us to pass the items to the closure by value instead of by reference.Important:
is_sorted_by_key
for slices and slice iterators is now no longer implemented in terms of the customslice::Iter::is_sorted_by
implementation. It's a trade-off: we could forwardslice::Iter::is_sorted_by_key
to it directly for potential SIMD benefits, but that would mean that the closure is potentially called twice for (almost) every element of the slice.