Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 8 pull requests #69258

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Feb 18, 2020
Merged

Rollup of 8 pull requests #69258

merged 16 commits into from
Feb 18, 2020

Conversation

JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost

ollie27 and others added 16 commits January 28, 2020 12:39
The main improvement is to make `last` no longer recursive.
Rather than a boolean `--enable-cflags` etc., these options should
reflect that they are for LLVM, and that they need a value. You would
now use `./configure --llvm-cflags="..."`.
This helps us have enough disk space for our builders to be able to complete
successfully. For now, the choices are ad-hoc and 'definitely not needed'. This
should never fail the build, as everything our build needs should be inside
Docker.
…ow554

recursion_limit parsing handles overflows

This PR adds overflow handling to `#![recursion_limit]` attribute parsing. If parsing the given value results in an `IntErrorKind::Overflow`, then the recursion_limit is set to `usize::max_value()`.

closes rust-lang#67265
Simplify `Skip::nth` and `Skip::last` implementations

The main improvement is to make `last` no longer recursive.
macOS: avoid calling pthread_self() twice
Do not ICE when encountering `yield` inside `async` block

Fix rust-lang#67158.
configure: set LLVM flags with a value

Rather than a boolean `--enable-cflags` etc., these options should
reflect that they are for LLVM, and that they need a value. You would
now use `./configure --llvm-cflags="..."`.
…ts, r=sfackler

Stabilize {f32, f64}::{LOG2_10, LOG10_2}

Following the decision to stabilize `LOG2_10` and `LOG10_2` in rust-lang#50540 (comment).

Closes rust-lang#50540.
r? @sfackler
…lbini

Clean out unused directories for extra disk space

This cleans out some of the unused (but large) directories on our linux builders to hopefully allow them to complete without running out of disk space.
@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=1001

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 18, 2020

📌 Commit c1a05fb has been approved by JohnTitor

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 18, 2020

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 100, this pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Feb 18, 2020
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 18, 2020

⌛ Testing commit c1a05fb with merge 6317721...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2020
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #67272 (recursion_limit parsing handles overflows)
 - #68597 (Simplify `Skip::nth` and `Skip::last` implementations)
 - #68767 (macOS: avoid calling pthread_self() twice)
 - #69175 (Do not ICE when encountering `yield` inside `async` block)
 - #69223 (Ignore GDB versions with broken str printing.)
 - #69244 (configure: set LLVM flags with a value)
 - #69249 (Stabilize {f32, f64}::{LOG2_10, LOG10_2})
 - #69252 (Clean out unused directories for extra disk space)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 18, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-azure
Approved by: JohnTitor
Pushing 6317721 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Feb 18, 2020
@bors bors merged commit c1a05fb into rust-lang:master Feb 18, 2020
@JohnTitor JohnTitor deleted the rollup-n2hljai branch February 18, 2020 14:51
@bors bors mentioned this pull request Feb 18, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants