-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Stabilize refcell_take #78608
Stabilize refcell_take #78608
Conversation
r? @cramertj (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
r? @KodrAus for FCP |
Team member @m-ou-se has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged team members: No concerns currently listed. Once a majority of reviewers approve (and at most 2 approvals are outstanding), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up! See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me. |
🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔 |
0ff995e
to
37199dd
Compare
The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete. As the automated representative of the governance process, I would like to thank the author for their work and everyone else who contributed. The RFC will be merged soon. |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 37199dd51e42896ca39febfb9748665208558509 has been approved by |
⌛ Testing commit 37199dd51e42896ca39febfb9748665208558509 with merge 4ddfa466b78236835e9cb598caccb3e6b79a6183... |
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
Looks like in the meantime a |
37199dd
to
ca60a15
Compare
ca60a15
to
5c6689b
Compare
Thanks @ThinkChaos! @bors r+ |
📌 Commit 5c6689b has been approved by |
Thank you all, especially @m-ou-se, you've been really helpful and responsive! |
…r=m-ou-se Stabilize refcell_take Tracking Issue: rust-lang#71395 `@KodrAus` nominated this for FCP, so here's a PR! I've never made a stabilization PR, so please mention if there's anything I can improve, thanks.
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#76941 (Add f{32,64}::is_subnormal) - rust-lang#77697 (Split each iterator adapter and source into individual modules) - rust-lang#78305 (Stabilize alloc::Layout const functions) - rust-lang#78608 (Stabilize refcell_take) - rust-lang#78793 (Clean up `StructuralEq` docs) - rust-lang#79267 (BTreeMap: address namespace conflicts) - rust-lang#79293 (Add test for eval order for a+=b) - rust-lang#79295 (BTreeMap: fix minor testing mistakes in rust-lang#78903) - rust-lang#79297 (BTreeMap: swap the names of NodeRef::new and Root::new_leaf) - rust-lang#79299 (Stabilise `then`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
Just a mention in stabilized APIs would be nice, thanks! |
@m-ou-se Any chance of putting that label on? |
That seems like a good idea! Although not all PRs would apply. |
Tracking Issue: #71395
@KodrAus nominated this for FCP, so here's a PR!
I've never made a stabilization PR, so please mention if there's anything I can improve, thanks.