-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document why not use concat! in dbg! macro #81233
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
r? @m-ou-se (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Jan 21, 2021
tesuji
changed the title
Reduce code generated by dbg! macro
Document why not use concat! in dbg! macro
Jan 21, 2021
Thanks! @bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit 6f22803e052bfdcb0a4879940b5a3509ac890340 has been approved by |
🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 1000. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened. |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Jan 21, 2021
ojeda
suggested changes
Jan 21, 2021
Co-authored-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit d0c1405 has been approved by |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2021
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#80573 (Deny rustc::internal lints for rustdoc and clippy) - rust-lang#81173 (Expand docs on Iterator::intersperse) - rust-lang#81194 (Stabilize std::panic::panic_any.) - rust-lang#81202 (Don't prefix 0x for each segments in `dbg!(Ipv6)`) - rust-lang#81225 (Make 'docs' nullable in rustdoc-json output) - rust-lang#81227 (Remove doctree::StructType) - rust-lang#81233 (Document why not use concat! in dbg! macro) - rust-lang#81236 (Gracefully handle loop labels missing leading `'` in different positions) - rust-lang#81241 (Turn alloc's force_expr macro into a regular macro_rules.) - rust-lang#81242 (Enforce statically that `MIN_NON_ZERO_CAP` is calculated at compile time) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Original title: Reduce code generated by
dbg!
macroThe expanded code before/after: https://rust.godbolt.org/z/hE3j95.
We cannot use
concat!
sincefile!
could contains{
or the expression is a block ({ .. }
).Using it will generated malformed format strings.
So let's document this reason why we don't use
concat!
macro at all.