Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reintroduce accidentally deleted assertions. #83018

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2021

Conversation

oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

@oli-obk oli-obk commented Mar 11, 2021

These were removed in #50198

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @davidtwco

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 11, 2021
Copy link
Member

@davidtwco davidtwco left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r=me when CI passes

@eddyb
Copy link
Member

eddyb commented Mar 11, 2021

I would like to see a crater run on this, perhaps? Maybe there is some constant in the wild that we've let through despite our algorithms disagreeing on the exact bitpattern?

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented Mar 11, 2021

This is very small and easily reverted. I think we should just merge it and see what the next beta crater says

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented Mar 11, 2021

@bors r=davidtwco

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 11, 2021

📌 Commit c69b108 has been approved by davidtwco

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 11, 2021
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor Author

oli-obk commented Mar 11, 2021

@bors rollup

@jackh726
Copy link
Member

I feel like if this is something we might expect breakage on, we probably should rollup? Even if it's really small. (Then we can bisect to this exact change?)

JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2021
Reintroduce accidentally deleted assertions.

These were removed in rust-lang#50198
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2021
Reintroduce accidentally deleted assertions.

These were removed in rust-lang#50198
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2021
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#80385 (Clarify what `Cell::replace` returns)
 - rust-lang#82571 (Rustdoc Json: Add tests for Reexports, and improve jsondocck)
 - rust-lang#82860 (Add `-Z unpretty` flag for the THIR)
 - rust-lang#82950 (convert slice doc link to intra-doc links)
 - rust-lang#82965 (Add spirv extension handling in compiletest)
 - rust-lang#82966 (update MSYS2 link in README)
 - rust-lang#82979 (Fix "run" button position in error index)
 - rust-lang#83001 (Ignore Vim swap files)
 - rust-lang#83003 (rustdoc: tweak the search index format)
 - rust-lang#83013 (Adjust some `#[cfg]`s to take non-Unix non-Windows operating systems into account)
 - rust-lang#83018 (Reintroduce accidentally deleted assertions.)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 14846d9 into rust-lang:master Mar 12, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.52.0 milestone Mar 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants