Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 4 pull requests #86023

Closed

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

liigo and others added 9 commits May 20, 2021 14:54
Copy only non-matching bytes.
…=m-ou-se

String::remove_matches O(n^2) -> O(n)

Copy only non-matching bytes. Replace collection of matches into a
vector with iteration over rejections, exploiting the guarantee that we
mutate parts of the haystack that have already been searched over.

r? `@joshtriplett`
td align attribute

This is a follow-up of rust-lang#85972. I have put this one on its own because it changes the display:

![Screenshot from 2021-06-03 21-49-11](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3050060/120703622-d533d280-c4b5-11eb-9519-ea1131a40bee.png)

Without align:

![Screenshot from 2021-06-03 21-49-15](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3050060/120703623-d5cc6900-c4b5-11eb-95f9-878d3915c7fb.png)

I also opened an issue about it: pulldown-cmark/pulldown-cmark#533. However, I'm not sure if this is the right course of action... Should we instead ignore the warning?

r? `@jsha`
msp430 linker does not accept -znoexecstack. Set linker_is_gnu to fal…

…se as workaround for now.

Tested locally and works. Closes rust-lang#85948.
@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Jun 5, 2021
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r+ p=4 rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 5, 2021

📌 Commit b610b22 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jun 5, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 5, 2021

⌛ Testing commit b610b22 with merge 22173d79e0d51413db2ac36f8ed42e59bf036286...

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job dist-i586-gnu-i586-i686-musl failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
thread panicked while panicking. aborting.
error: test failed, to rerun pass '-p alloc --test collectionstests'

Caused by:
  process didn't exit successfully: `/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2-std/i586-unknown-linux-gnu/release/deps/collectionstests-b7619a21b3e02624` (signal: 4, SIGILL: illegal instruction)


command did not execute successfully: "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/cargo" "test" "--target" "i586-unknown-linux-gnu" "-Zbinary-dep-depinfo" "-j" "16" "--release" "--locked" "--color" "always" "--features" "panic-unwind backtrace compiler-builtins-c" "--manifest-path" "/checkout/library/test/Cargo.toml" "-p" "alloc" "--"


failed to run: /checkout/obj/build/bootstrap/debug/bootstrap --stage 2 test --host= --target i586-unknown-linux-gnu,i686-unknown-linux-musl
Build completed unsuccessfully in 0:23:20

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 5, 2021

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jun 5, 2021
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

No idea if #83515 or #86014 is responsible here... Let's see which one will fail on the CI then!

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the rollup-3peyj71 branch June 5, 2021 14:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants