-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rustdoc: Start cleaning up search index generation #92340
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
60a1abe
Rename `rustdoc::html::render::cache` to `search_index`
camelid e19593f
rustdoc: Remove some unnecessary `cache` parameters
camelid 2b801dc
Move `ExternalLocation` to `clean::types`
camelid bd6692c
Make `search_index` functions private where possible
camelid afb77a9
Coalesce two arguments as `&Function`
camelid 5c8e8e5
Give clearer names to several search index functions
camelid 7d1ec64
Remove unused parameter
camelid 908a9d4
Add regression test for #59502
camelid File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this is the right move because of:
We are replacing
def_id_no_primitives
calls, so we need to keep theCache
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, I see what you mean, but the
Cache
can easily be re-added later. As of now, passing around theCache
is just dead code that might be sitting there for a while.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I reviewed a PR doing exactly that today (but of course, can't find it again...). I'd prefer to avoid having removals/adds following but not sure it matters much since it's just about git history here...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you're thinking of #92342? I'd rather remove the dead code for now – e.g., that PR may not work and end up being closed, and then the dead code will still be there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't fully agree with you but it's fine. Let's move forward then!