Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 11 pull requests #94531

Closed
wants to merge 41 commits into from

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

sunfishcode and others added 30 commits January 26, 2022 16:27
Following up on rust-lang#88564, this adds documentation explaining why
`BorrowedFd::to_owned` returns another `BorrowedFd` rather than an
`OwnedFd`. And similar for `BorrowedHandle` and `BorrowedSocket`.
This change weakens the descriptions of the
`{as,into,from}_raw_{fd,handle,socket}` descriptions from saying that
they *do* express ownership relations to say that they are *typically used*
in ways that express ownership relations. This needed needed since, for
example, std's own [`RawFd`] implements `{As,From,Into}Fd` without any of
the ownership relationships.

This adds proper `# Safety` comments to `from_raw_{fd,handle,socket}`,
adds the requirement that raw handles be not opened with the
`FILE_FLAG_OVERLAPPED` flag, and merges the `OwnedHandle::from_raw_handle`
comment into the main `FromRawHandle::from_raw_handle` comment.

And, this changes `HandleOrNull` and `HandleOrInvalid` to not implement
`FromRawHandle`, since they are intended for limited use in FFI situations,
and not for generic use, and they have constraints that are stronger than
the those of `FromRawHandle`.

[`RawFd`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/os/unix/io/type.RawFd.html
This function is documented in more detail in the `FromRawSocket` trait.
Also, rename `BorrowedHandle::borrow_raw_handle` and
`BorrowedSocket::borrow_raw_socket` to `BorrowedHandle::borrow_raw` and
`BorrowedSocket::borrow_raw`.

This is just a minor rename to reduce redundancy in the user code calling
these functions, and to eliminate an inessential difference between
`BorrowedFd` code and `BorrowedHandle`/`BorrowedSocket` code.

While here, add a simple test exercising `BorrowedFd::borrow_raw_fd`.
Only point at the end of the crate. We could try making it point at the
beginning of the crate, but that is confused with `DUMMY_SP`, causing
the output to be *worse*.

This change will make it so that VSCode will *not* underline the whole
file when `main` is missing, so other errors will be visible.
Add `rustc_middle::ty::suggest_constraining_type_params` that suggests
adding multiple constraints.

`suggest_constraining_type_param` now just forwards params to this new
function.
Previously we've only suggested adding `Copy` bounds when the type being
moved/copied is a type parameter (generic). With this commit we also
suggest adding bounds when a type
- Can be copy
- All predicates that need to be satisfied for that are based on type
  params

i.e. we will suggest `T: Copy` for `Option<T>`, but won't suggest
anything for `Option<String>`.

Future work: it would be nice to also suggest adding `.clone()` calls
Modify the tier 3 non-ARM targets to show the standard library will no longer build for these and there is no work being done to change that.
adds more archs for openbsd: arm, mips64, powerpc, powerpc64, and riscv64.
update char signess for openbsd

it adds more archs support for openbsd: arm, mips64, powerpc, powerpc64, and riscv64.
Do not point at whole file missing `fn main`

Only point at the end of the crate. We could try making it point at the
beginning of the crate, but that is confused with `DUMMY_SP`, causing
the output to be *worse*.

This change will make it so that VSCode will *not* underline the whole
file when `main` is missing, so other errors will be visible.
…rrowedfd-toowned, r=joshtriplett

Add documentation about `BorrowedFd::to_owned`.

Following up on rust-lang#88564, this adds documentation explaining why
`BorrowedFd::to_owned` returns another `BorrowedFd` rather than an
`OwnedFd`. And similar for `BorrowedHandle` and `BorrowedSocket`.

r? `@joshtriplett`
…joshtriplett

Update the documentation for `{As,Into,From}Raw{Fd,Handle,Socket}`.

This change weakens the descriptions of the
`{as,into,from}_raw_{fd,handle,socket}` descriptions from saying that
they *do* express ownership relations to say that they are *typically used*
in ways that express ownership relations. This is needed since, for
example, std's own [`RawFd`] implements `{As,From,Into}Fd` without any of
the ownership relationships.

This adds proper `# Safety` comments to `from_raw_{fd,handle,socket}`,
adds the requirement that raw handles be not opened with the
`FILE_FLAG_OVERLAPPED` flag, and merges the `OwnedHandle::from_raw_handle`
comment into the main `FromRawHandle::from_raw_handle` comment.

And, this changes `HandleOrNull` and `HandleOrInvalid` to not implement
`FromRawHandle`, since they are intended for limited use in FFI situations,
and not for generic use, and they have constraints that are stronger than
the those of `FromRawHandle`.

[`RawFd`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/os/unix/io/type.RawFd.html
…, r=joshtriplett

Rename `BorrowedFd::borrow_raw_fd` to `BorrowedFd::borrow_raw`.

Also, rename `BorrowedHandle::borrow_raw_handle` and
`BorrowedSocket::borrow_raw_socket` to `BorrowedHandle::borrow_raw` and
`BorrowedSocket::borrow_raw`.

This is just a minor rename to reduce redundancy in the user code calling
these functions, and to eliminate an inessential difference between
`BorrowedFd` code and `BorrowedHandle`/`BorrowedSocket` code.

While here, add a simple test exercising `BorrowedFd::borrow_raw_fd`.

r? `@joshtriplett`
Ensure stability directives are checked in all cases

Split off  rust-lang#93017

Stability and deprecation were not checked in all cases, for instance if a type error happened.
This PR moves the check earlier in the pipeline to ensure the errors are emitted in all cases.

r? ````@lcnr````
…ebank

Adt copy suggestions

Previously we've only suggested adding `Copy` bounds when the type being moved/copied is a type parameter (generic). With this PR we also suggest adding bounds when a type
- Can be copy
- All predicates that need to be satisfied for that are based on type params

i.e. we will suggest `T: Copy` for `Option<T>`, but won't suggest anything for `Option<String>`.

An example:
```rust
fn duplicate<T>(t: Option<T>) -> (Option<T>, Option<T>) {
    (t, t)
}
```
New error (current compiler doesn't provide `help`:):
```text
error[E0382]: use of moved value: `t`
 --> t.rs:2:9
  |
1 | fn duplicate<T>(t: Option<T>) -> (Option<T>, Option<T>) {
  |                 - move occurs because `t` has type `Option<T>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
2 |     (t, t)
  |      -  ^ value used here after move
  |      |
  |      value moved here
  |
help: consider restricting type parameter `T`
  |
1 | fn duplicate<T: Copy>(t: Option<T>) -> (Option<T>, Option<T>) {
  |               ++++++
```

Fixes rust-lang#93623
r? `````@estebank`````
`````@rustbot````` label +A-diagnostics +A-suggestion-diagnostics +C-enhancement

----

I'm not at all sure if this is the right implementation for this kind of suggestion, but it seems to work :')
…henkov

Improve allowness of the unexpected_cfgs lint

This pull-request improve the allowness (`#[allow(...)]`) of the `unexpected_cfgs` lint.

Before this PR only crate level `#![allow(unexpected_cfgs)]` worked, now with this PR it also work when put around `cfg!` or if it is in a upper level. Making it work ~for the attributes `cfg`, `cfg_attr`, ...~ for the same level is awkward as the current code is design to give "Some parent node that is close to this macro call" (cf. https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_expand/base/struct.ExpansionData.html) meaning that allow on the same line as an attribute won't work. I'm note even sure if this would be possible.

Found while working on rust-lang#94298.
r? ``````@petrochenkov``````
Documentation was missed when demoting Windows XP to no_std only

After a quick discussion on rust-lang#81250 which removed special casing for mutexes added [here](rust-lang@10b103a) to support Windows XP, we can't say that the standard library can build for it.

This change modifies the tier 3 non-ARM targets to show the standard library will no longer build for these and there is no work being done to change that.
Miri/CTFE: properly treat overflow in (signed) division/rem as UB

To my surprise, it looks like LLVM treats overflow of signed div/rem as UB. From what I can tell, MIR `Div`/`Rem` directly lowers to the corresponding LLVM operation, so to make that correct we also have to consider these overflows UB in the CTFE/Miri interpreter engine.

r? ````@oli-obk````
…lacrum

Remove num_cpus dependency from bootstrap, build-manifest and rustc_s…

…ession

`std::threads::available_parallelism` was stabilized in rust 1.59.

r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Mar 2, 2022
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=11

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 2, 2022

📌 Commit be86bac has been approved by matthiaskrgr

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Mar 2, 2022
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-jp6asky branch March 11, 2022 15:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.